Vice President Sara Z. Duterte on Monday appeared before the Taguig City Prosecutor’s Office following the filing of the second perjury complaint against Mr. Ramil Madriaga. The Vice President was accompanied by her legal counsel, Atty. Paolo Panelo, during the filing.
COURTESY: Office of the Vice President
A Taguig City prosecutor has recommended the dismissal of a perjury complaint filed by Vice President Sara Duterte against self-proclaimed Duterte bagman Ramil Madriaga, finding that the evidence on record failed to establish that he knowingly and willfully made materially false statements under oath.
In a resolution dated 2 September, the prosecutor said the evidence presented by Duterte was insufficient to establish prima facie, with reasonable certainty of conviction, that Madriaga committed perjury in violation of Article 183 of the Revised Penal Code.
“While complainant has presented evidence disputing respondent’s assertions, the evidence presently on record does not establish prima facie, with reasonable certainty of conviction, that respondent knowingly and willfully made materially false statements under oath,” the resolution said.
“In perjury, where deliberate falsity constitutes the very essence of the offense, the prosecutor must exercise sound discretion and ensure that the criminal process is not employed as a substitute for resolving factual controversies,” it added.
Madriaga, who has described himself as a former intelligence operative and campaign operator linked to Duterte, made allegations concerning the vice president’s campaign operations and alleged handling of money. His November 2025 affidavit was later cited in impeachment complaints against Duterte.
Duterte filed her first perjury complaint against Madriaga with the Taguig City Prosecutor’s Office on 4 March, accusing him of lying about alleged links to illegal campaign funding and cash deliveries.
She subsequently filed a second perjury complaint on 17 August over statements in Madriaga’s supplemental affidavit dated 11 April. Her lawyer, Paolo Panelo Jr., said the second complaint was supported by Duterte’s sworn testimony, 12 corroborating witnesses and government records, among other evidence.
Panelo later said Duterte’s camp wanted the two complaints consolidated because the allegations and evidence were related.
DAILY TRIBUNE reached out to both camp for comment on the prosecutor’s recommendation.
