Dekada occupied the gallery’s atrium and spilled into Gallery One and the Multipurpose Hall, almost engulfing the building. It was also part of a multisite, multidisciplinary series of exhibitions, film screenings, discussions and public interventions running from July to December 2026.
Lerma described it as the largest gathering yet of advocacy groups and institutions seeking justice for victims and protesting the killings. Artists, journalists, academics, lawyers, church groups and human-rights defenders took part, as well as the families affected by extrajudicial killings.
According to Lerma, its impetus came from the families themselves, who reminded organizers that the tenth anniversary was approaching. Asked what they wanted to do, they said they wished to gather and remember. Hence the title — and their deep involvement in assembling the exhibition.
Harrowing exhibition
Dekada described itself as “a living archive, never final,” curated and created by a community that had witnessed the slaughter carried out under the name of a war on drugs. At its heart was a reclamation of humanity: the lives of people whom Duterte’s government had treated as less than human.
Relatives of the dead served as exhibition guides, telling visitors their stories and making the experience more immediate, personal and painful. Through these first-person accounts and its immersive environments, Dekada became one of the most heart-wrenching exhibitions I had encountered in years. Its forms were diverse: traditional artworks and interactive stations, monumental installations and intimate mementos, printed matter and audiovisual works.
At the center of the atrium stood Julie Lluch’s Spoliarium in the Regime of EJK (marble and acrylic, 2020). The sculpture echoes a central image in Juan Luna’s famous painting — a man dragging a fallen body by a rope — and speaks across time of brutality, degradation and abuse.
Nearby, accordion-fold panels carried a 10-year timeline of the drug war. It sought to ensure “that 10 years of destruction are neither sanitized nor forgotten” and to ground “our collective remembrance and unbroken pursuit for justice and accountability.” Visitors affixed handwritten messages on multicolored notes to the predominantly white panels, registering anger, solidarity, grief, and the desire for healing.
Among the largest installations was Samael Pascual’s Humihingang Lansangan (2026), a graffiti work on patched corrugated-iron sheets. It bore his short poem “Pauwi,” spoken in the innocent voice of a child who does not understand that he has been killed. He addresses his mother as though he were merely coming home after playing, transforming the promise of return and embrace into a final, unfulfilled farewell.
In Archie Oclos’ installation Papag (2025), candle wax from Silingan Candle Makers — a group composed of relatives of EJK victims — was pressed against the surfaces of places where violence had occurred, taking impressions of their cracks, abrasions and textures. Nearby, candles burned above a bust of Duterte, their wax dripping steadily onto his likeness. Over time, the face would be obscured and burdened by the same material used for mourning and remembrance.
The work of photojournalists Lerma, Ezra Acayan, Rico Cruz, Kimberly dela Cruz, Vincent Go, Eloisa Lopez, Hannah Reyes Morales, Basilio Sepe and Br. Jun Santiago, CSsR, appeared in Pagsubaybay, a collection that countered the abstractions of policy and statistics with the vivid realism of documented lives.
In Karapatan’s towering memorial installation, portraits of victims hung like rain, transforming an overwhelming death toll into individual faces, names, and lives.
The deeper one moved into the exhibition, the darker and more heartbreaking it became.
On one wall hung a cast of a simple white dress: Nikki Luna’s Cast Dress of Charlie Jean, made of resin and first exhibited in This Is How to Be a Woman of the World. Its stillness belied the violence behind it.
“Charlie Jean was fourteen when a twenty-nine-year-old man began grooming her; by fifteen, she was pregnant and living in his home,” Luna wrote in the accompanying note. Her mother gave her the dress for her birthday on 30 September 2017. Three weeks later, police stormed the house. Bullets tore through Charlie Jean’s arms, stomach and body as she begged for her life and that of her unborn son, already named Jesus.
Police later claimed that she had been holding a grenade, “a fabrication that turned a 14-year-old survivor of grooming into a headline of guilt,” Luna wrote. Before the raid and the label, however, Charlie Jean was a seventh grader who had just received a birthday dress from her mother. “This dress is what remains of the girl beneath the story — cast in permanence so that her life, not the accusation, is what endures.”
The installation DekadaTV recreated a typical Filipino sala, or living room, with a television showing films about the drug war’s harrowing effects. It restored the sala as a communal space: one in which people could sit together, choose what to watch, discuss what they had seen, and perhaps recover the pakikipagkapwa eroded by the campaign’s language of suspicion and dehumanization.
A larger installation recreated an entire room, complete with furniture, clothes, personal belongings and handwritten notes, many contributed by the victims’ families. Visitors were invited to enter as they would the home of a relative, and to encounter the humanity of people whom propaganda had portrayed as irredeemably bad — even monstrous.
What remains
A message from the families read: “Like visiting a friend’s house, we want you to see them not only through the way they died, but through the way they lived — with names, faces, dreams, families and homes to return to. Here are traces of people who loved, dreamed, worked, cared and were loved.” Against the long-repeated claims that the dead were “bad” or that they had fought back — “nanlaban sila” — the families insisted: “Not everyone who was killed was a bad person. There were good people who once lived among us. And now, they are gone.”
Recreated objects sat beside actual mementos. Among them were the gravestones of Luis Bonifacio and his son Gabriel, retrieved from Manila North Cemetery by Luis’ wife, Mary Ann Domingo, after their remains were exhumed when the lease on their niches expired. The stones had marked their deaths; in the gallery, they became witnesses to lives and to a family’s continuing demand for justice.
There were many more works to see and contemplate, and still more stories to hear. The exhibition deserved several visits, although each one would exact an emotional cost.
I asked Lerma whether photojournalists had followed the police during operations. He said they were usually called only after the killings and then allowed to photograph the scene. In the presence of police officers, shocked relatives were often too afraid to speak. It was at the funerals that journalists could finally talk with them.
Lerma later realized that the photographs had been welcomed partly because the killings themselves were being publicized to spread fear. The victims were made examples of what Duterte could — and would — do. But the images escaped that intended use. They opened many eyes to the campaign’s impunity and inhumanity and eventually became part of the body of evidence marshalled in the pursuit of accountability. The photographers resisted having their craft turned into an instrument of terror. Their images became, instead, instruments of resistance and remembrance — an insistence on truth, and perhaps a path toward justice.
I thanked Lerma for continuing to hold the line before stepping outside, where the rain had softened to a drizzle, as though leaving room for hope.