The Supreme Court agreed with the Ombudsman that court proceedings at all levels must remain accountable to the public, stressing that this is a constitutional requirement.

In a statement issued Thursday night, the SC said accountability in the judiciary “is not simply a matter of policy” but is required by the Constitution.

“The Court takes allegations of partiality, misconduct, and corruption seriously,” it said, adding that it acts on such allegations when proper complaints are filed, evidence is presented, and the judges or justices concerned are given an opportunity to respond.

However, the SC said it cannot act on broad allegations against an entire appellate court based solely on public statements.

“We therefore invite the Ombudsman, or any concerned party, to file the proper complaint and submit supporting evidence,” the Court said.

“This will allow the Court to determine the facts and, when warranted, exercise its disciplinary authority.”

The SC also cited its recent unanimous ruling in re Heydarian, Cendana, and Gadon in which it affirmed the public’s right to freedom of expression, including the right to criticize the courts and their decisions.

Despite strong statements made against the Court over one of its rulings, the SC said it upheld the respondents’ freedom of speech and did not hold them in contempt.

“The Court welcomes fair criticism,” it said. “At the same time, serious accusations against judges and courts should be raised through the proper processes so they can be fairly investigated and resolved.”