He said the authorization should be evaluated under the constitutional and statutory framework governing taxpayer information and the exercise of executive authority. He said his legal team found no indication that the Bureau of Internal Revenue had issued any tax assessment or deficiency finding against either him or Duterte, and questioned whether procedural requirements under the applicable framework were met before the authorization was issued.
Court urged to intervene
“The submission of documents to the Senate impeachment court is a procedural step. The legal significance, admissibility, and evidentiary value of those documents are matters for a judicial court to determine in accordance with the Constitution, applicable laws, and the rules of the Senate impeachment court,” Carpio said.
He urged the public to distinguish between legal allegations, procedural developments, and factual findings, saying that constitutional proceedings exist to resolve disputes through evidence before the proper tribunal — not through public commentary. He said his legal team would continue to raise all available legal arguments through the appropriate forums.
Malacañang, meanwhile, told Carpio he had nothing to fear if his conscience was clear.
Presidential Communications Undersecretary Claire Castro said in a video message Friday that Carpio was free to file any action he wished if he had issues with the tax documents release, but President Marcos was simply following the process and the law “for the truth.”
“Let us remember this: If you have nothing to hide and there are no irregularities to be found in the records being examined, then there is nothing to fear. In fact, you should be proud that your earnings were acquired honestly,” Castro said.