Defensor: Sara’s alleged kill remark impeachable, ‘betrayal of public trust’



For the wholly-owned water subsidiary of Metro Pacific Investments Corp., the spending push over the next five years is…

Kabataan Partylist Representative Renee Co pushed back Tuesday against Palace Press Officer Claire Castro, maintaining…

‘He is on deck. Considering that Attorney Poa is going to be presented in the impeachment court, common etiquette and…

‘The image is not part of the record and does not establish that he wore such a device or received outside assistance.…

Ateneo is set to induct new members to its famed Ateneo Sports Hall of Fame (ASHOF) this September.
Vice President Sara Duterte’s alleged admission that she had spoken to someone willing to kill President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr. constitutes an impeachable offense and a clear betrayal of public trust, House Senior Deputy Majority Leader Lorenz Defensor of Iloilo said.
The solon said the allegation — cited in several impeachment complaints now pending before the House — was the same ground he invoked when he signed an impeachment complaint against the Vice President last year.
“The very reason why I signed the impeachment complaint last year was because walang bise presidente ang nagsasabi na may kinausap na akong taong handang pumatay sa isang presidente,” Defensor said.
“That will always be an impeachable offense and a betrayal of public trust,” he added.
Asked whether the Vice President should be impeached on that ground, Defensor replied: “On that ground, yes. Same ground.”
The Iloilo lawmaker stressed that the principle applies regardless of who occupies the presidency.
“Kung manalo si Vice President Sara Duterte bilang presidente at sinabihan siya ng kanyang bise presidente na may kinausap din ako na taong handang pumatay sa kanya, I will sign the impeachment complaint again, kahit sinuman ’yan,” he said.
Defensor, one of the House prosecutors in last year’s impeachment proceedings, said he would again fulfill his constitutional role if chosen.
“Kung pipiliin ako bilang prosecutor, I will always do my constitutional duty,” he said.
Still, he underscored that the current complaints must go through the constitutional process before any vote in plenary.
“I can’t say. Right now, I can’t say. All I can say is it will be referred to the Committee on Justice for deliberation, for determination of sufficiency in form and sufficiency in substance, and that’s it for now,” he said when asked whether he would support the complaint if it reaches the floor.
Under Article XI, Section 3 of the Constitution, the House of Representatives has the exclusive power to initiate all cases of impeachment.
Once a verified complaint is filed and included in the Order of Business, it must be referred to the Committee on Justice to determine whether it is sufficient in form and in substance.
Only after the committee finds the complaint sufficient, and the required number of House members approve a resolution of impeachment, can the Articles of Impeachment be transmitted to the Senate, which has the sole power to try and decide the case.
Defensor said the House will proceed in accordance with its constitutional mandate.