A mining firm authorized by the government to operate has raised concerns over the temporary suspension of exploration activities issued by the Mines and Geosciences Bureau (MGB).

Woggle Corporation said leaked images of the MGB order had circulated publicly before the company officially received the notice on 11 February 2026.

While acknowledging the regulatory authority of the MGB, the company questioned the legal and contractual basis for the suspension. Woggle’s Exploration Permit, it said, was validly issued by the Government of the Republic of the Philippines and confers rights and obligations upon both the State and the permit holder.

The company argued that such permits are not privileges that can be revoked arbitrarily. They are governed by statutory standards, contractual principles, and constitutional safeguards against impairment of obligations. Woggle said it has complied with all terms and conditions of the permit.

The firm further noted that if the suspension is based on illegal barricades, political agitation, or disruptions caused by third parties, these circumstances do not justify penalizing the lawful permit holder. Woggle cited a court ruling that declared the barricades illegal and issued a writ of preliminary injunction.

Under force majeure principles, unforeseen events beyond the control of contracting parties may excuse performance but do not automatically void vested rights or transfer liability to the compliant party. Woggle stated that:

• Alleged disruptions are attributable to private individuals or groups;

• The permit holder has remained compliant with regulations; and

• Law enforcement remedies remain available to address unlawful obstruction.

The company also noted that the government’s due process requirement of a three-notice rule had not been fully observed. Woggle warned that suspending operations under these conditions could set a precedent where regulatory certainty depends on external disruption rather than established law.

The broader implications extend to the Philippine mining industry, which relies on long-term investment and regulatory predictability. Exploration requires significant upfront capital with the expectation that permits will be upheld.

The company highlighted potential economic consequences: over 1,200 employees and contractors connected to its Runruno operations in Nueva Vizcaya depend directly or indirectly on continued exploration. Prolonged suspension could affect livelihoods, local procurement networks, and community development initiatives.

Woggle said it is reviewing all legal remedies available, including administrative, contractual, and constitutional avenues, to protect its rights under Philippine law. The company has requested that the MGB:

1. Provide a clear legal basis for the suspension;

2. Clarify whether force majeure is correctly invoked and under what authority; and

3. Confirm the government’s commitment to regulatory stability and the protection of lawful investments.

The firm stated it remains committed to responsible exploration, environmental compliance, and engagement with national and local stakeholders.