SC rejects bid to overturn writ of amparo for environmental advocates
The Supreme Court upholds writs of amparo and habeas data for two environmental advocates, rejecting military and police officers’ bid to overturn the…
Tip: add a year in your query (e.g. Eala 2022) or use the year filter.
562 results for “Writ of Amparo”
The Supreme Court upholds writs of amparo and habeas data for two environmental advocates, rejecting military and police officers’ bid to overturn the…
The Court of Appeals granted the Writ of Amparo to missing indigenous rights advocates Dexter Capuyan and Gene Roz Jamil “Bazoo” De Jesus, declaring them…
The court directed the Quad Committee to comment on the petition for prohibition within 10 days of receiving the court’s resolution
Pastors file writ of amparo vs AFP
Supreme Court halts quarrying in Bulacan forest reserve, issuing a writ of kalikasan and TEPO to protect the Angat River–Bustos Dam watershed.
Atty. Kathy Panguban of the National Union of Peoples’ Lawyers, along with anti-mining advocates from Kalikasan People’s Network for the Environment, files a…
The Supreme Court has ordered government agencies and contractors to respond to a Writ of Kalikasan petition filed by the Lawyers for Commuters Safety and…
Lawyers and advocates seek a Supreme Court Writ of Kalikasan vs the entire government over alleged flood control failures and environmental neglect.
The DPWH says construction of the P23.5-B Samal-Davao Connector Bridge will continue despite a Supreme Court-issued Writ of Kalikasan, citing environmental…
Court partially grants Vic Sotto's writ of habeas data against Darryl Yap, orders removal of controversial teaser video from 'The Rapists of Pepsi Paloma' film.
The Supreme Court ruled that a writ of mandamus is a remedy granted by law when any tribunal, corporation, board, officer, or person unlawfully neglects the…
Datem had provided sufficient evidence to support its allegation of ‘fraud’ against Megaworld, which justified the issuance of the WPA
‘Besides conjectures and conflicting statements, the petitioners offered no concrete proof that the respondents are remiss in their duties.’