
ATHENS, Greece (AFP) — A Greek woman has given birth from an embryo frozen over 22 years ago, months after her son born…

Ombudsman Jesus Crispin Remulla said the Cayetano siblings’ recent overseas trip was nothing more than time off after…

Filipino teachers in Kuwait are not affected by the ongoing layoffs in the country’s public education system, the…
Four former bodyguards of ex-congressman Zaldy Co were arrested Friday over a cyberlibel case but they were released…

Remulla said ‘a public hospital was the right place’ to hold Romualdez as all detainees should be treated equally.
The Supreme Court of the Philippines has ordered the immediate suspension of alleged illegal quarrying activities inside a protected forest reserve in Bulacan, issuing a writ of kalikasan against a construction firm and its representatives.
In a decision penned by Associate Justice Amy Lazaro-Javier, the High Court granted the petition of Narciso De Leon, directing Halrey Construction Inc. and other persons acting on its behalf to immediately cease quarrying, excavation, and earth extraction activities within the Angat River–Bustos Dam Forest Reserve in Barangay Banaban, Angat, Bulacan.
The SC also issued a temporary environmental protection order (TEPO), prohibiting the respondents from continuing any activity that could further damage the watershed.
The Court said the firm’s operations had significantly increased surface runoff, erosion, and sedimentation in the area.
These environmental impacts, it added, have already led to the destruction of crops, vegetation, and fruit-bearing trees that serve as habitats for wildlife.
Applying the precautionary principle, the SC emphasized that even partial disruption of a protected forest reserve can threaten the stability of the entire watershed system, particularly one as critical as the Angat River–Bustos Dam, a key water source for surrounding communities.
“In issuing the writ, the SC applied the precautionary principle based on technical findings showing that the respondents’ activities have significantly increased surface runoff, erosion, and sedimentation within the watershed system,” the Court said.
“Reports indicated that these activities have destroyed cultivated crops, vegetation, and fruit-bearing trees that serve as wildlife habitats,” it added.
The reserve is protected under Proclamation No. 573, and the Court warned that continued degradation could pose serious risks to both the environment and communities dependent on the watershed.