
The so-called “Oplan Romanov,” or the alleged covert operation purportedly aimed at eliminating Vice President Sara…

TACLOBAN CITY — Just a week after classes resumed following a fatal mass shooting on campus, officials at San Jose…

The Philippine Charity Sweepstakes Office (PCSO) has signed up another corporation to expand public access to the…

Water reserves at Pantabangan Dam are rising steadily following heavy rains brought by the southwest monsoon and…

Bureau of Customs (BoC) personnel at the Port of Clark have intercepted four shipments containing marijuana resin and…
Read next

What's your take?
Google Preferred Sources
Get more Daily Tribune stories in your search results
Add Daily Tribune as a preferred source on Google Search.
Continue reading
The Supreme Court dismissed a court stenographer for habitual disrespectful, disobedient, and offensive behavior.
In its 18-page decision, the SC found Lorna Martin, Court Stenographer I of the Municipal Circuit Trial Court of Sta. Ignacia, Tarlac, guilty of violating the Code of Conduct for Court Personnel for committing Gross Misconduct and Gross Insubordination.
Martin was ordered immediately dismissed from the service, with forfeiture of benefits, cancellation of her civil service eligibility, and perpetual disqualification from re-employment in any government instrumentality, including government-owned and controlled corporations.
To recall, Judge Stela Marie Gandia-Asuncion and several cout employees of MCTC-Sta. Ignacia, Tarlac, in 2017, a complaint filed against Martin for repeatedly committing misconduct and exhibiting disrespectful and arrogant behavior in the performance of her duties as a court stenographer.
Among the allegations are incidents where Martin barged into Gandia-Asuncion's office and hurled invectives at the judge for correcting Martin's draft orders.
The complainants also claimed that Martin repeatedly refused to comply with Judge Gandia-Asuncion's orders, including the submission of stenographic notes and recordings of hearings.
The SC said that Martin committed six counts of violation of the Code of Conduct for Court Personnel, which requires all court personnel to perform official duties properly and with diligence and to carry out their responsibilities as public servants in as courteous a manner as possible.