Bank of Korea told to kick its carbon habit



Salmon Finance has expanded its partnership with retailer EMCOR, adding more than 100 stores across the Visayas and…

The Philippines already has many of the pieces. Digital payments have reached the mainstream. Regulators are testing…

Britain’s national weather agency predicted that Super El Niño could make 2027 the hottest year globally.

Singapore and Vietnam expressed support for building on the Philippines’ climate agenda as Association of Southeast…

Real resilience requires fewer heroic efforts after an emergency because we have done more of what must be done before…
The Bank of Korea’s (BoK) collateral policies favor high-carbon assets over green investments, effectively providing an “implicit subsidy” to fossil fuel-intensive industries, a new study found.
Research by the Institute for Green Transformation (IGT) and Positive Money showed that more than half of bonds pledged by financial firms as BoK collateral come from fossil fuel and high-emission sectors. Green and sustainability bonds account for less than 2 percent.
The study also found that the average “haircut,” or reduction in collateral value to account for risk, imposed on green bonds is twice the average across all bonds. Researchers said this makes green bonds less attractive while favorable treatment of high-carbon assets can help their issuers access cheaper financing.
Despite the BoK saying its measures made 70 percent of green bonds eligible as collateral, researchers found green bonds represented just 0.4 percent of collateral actually pledged.
Between 2021 and 2025, fossil fuel and high-emission bonds pledged as collateral increased sixfold, compared with a threefold increase for green and sustainability bonds.
“The preferential treatment that high-carbon assets receive within the Bank of Korea’s collateral framework acts as an implicit subsidy to these sectors,” Positive Money senior researcher Joe Herbert said.
Giwon Choi of IGT said the findings showed the framework “structurally favours fossil fuels over green assets.”
The groups urged the BoK to explicitly recognize green bonds in its collateral framework, adjust haircuts based on environmental risks and exclude assets associated with severe environmental risks. They also called for greater disclosure of environmental information on the central bank’s collateral pool.