Tuesday, 28 July 2026
Nasdaq -0.47%
Subscribe NowSupport Us

Daily TribuneDaily TribuneDaily Tribune

Daily TribuneDaily TribuneDaily Tribune
Subscribe
Tuesday, 28 July 2026
  • SONATOTOO
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Business
  • Life
  • Show
  • Sports
  • Global Goals
Partner feature
Daily TribuneDaily Tribune

The Philippines' leading digital newspaper.

News
  • Headlines
  • Page three
  • Metro
  • Nation
  • World
  • Dyaryo Tirada
  • Obituary (Remember Me)
Opinion
  • All columnists
  • Editorials
  • Guest essays
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Scuttlebutt
Business
  • Shipping
  • Portraits
  • Pep
  • Business Advisories
  • Technology (Tech Talks)
Life
  • Show
  • Food & Drink
  • Getaways
  • Arts & Culture
  • Social Set
  • Spaces
  • Fashion & Beauty
  • The Edit
  • Top Form
  • Next Gen
  • Sacred Space
  • Project Larawan
  • Snaps
Sports
  • Hoops
  • Volley
  • Golf
  • Goal
  • Boxing
  • Tennis
  • Esports
  • Blast

Company

  • SONATOTOO
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Privacy
  • Subscribe
  • Support Us

© 2026 Daily Tribune · tribune.net.ph · Powered by Quintype

OPINION

‘Unbearable’ employment

Joji Alonso·28 July 2026, 10:14 pm·1 MIN READ

‘Unbearable’ employment
Text size

Share

Partner feature

Stay informed

Get Daily Tribune in your inbox

Breaking news, opinion, and business coverage for readers in the Philippines and abroad.

Subscribe to the newsletter

Read next

Too dense to lead

Too dense to lead

What's your take?

Share

Google Preferred Sources

Get more Daily Tribune stories in your search results

Add Daily Tribune as a preferred source on Google Search.

Add to Google

Continue reading

  • Caloocan crash claims police officer
    Caloocan crash claims police officer
  • PNP orders probe into explosives found 
near DoJ, Senate
    PNP orders probe into explosives found near DoJ, Senate
  • Long and winding road (2)
    Long and winding road (2)
Partner feature
Partner feature

Suggested Articles

A nation worth believing in
OPINION

A nation worth believing in

Constructive criticism, the kind that sharpens a policy, exposes a genuine failure, and holds power to account, is the…

Jose Dominic F. Clavano IV·1 hour ago

Myanmar rains on Nationals' parade
GOAL

Myanmar rains on Nationals' parade

CAPAS, Tarlac — The Philippine national men's football team opened its ASEAN Championship campaign on the wrong foot,…

Ivan Suing·1 hour ago

Leadership disease
OPINION

Leadership disease

When they are opposed, these gods of our god-forsaken country take to social media to air their rage, their threats and…

Dinah S. Ventura·1 hour ago

Scientists cite gaps in biodiversity research, no data in some WPS features
NATION

Scientists cite gaps in biodiversity research, no data in some WPS features

Filipino scientists on Tuesday reported that many islands, reefs, and other features in the West Philippine Sea remain…

Sean A. Magbanua·5 hours ago

Unauthorized absence
OPINION

Unauthorized absence

Dear Atty. Peachy,

Joji Alonso·6 July 2026

    • Philippine labor law
    • Constructive Dismissal
    • Employee resignation

    Dear Atty. Kathy,

    We have an employee, E, who just resigned. In his resignation letter, E said that he is grateful to the company and his colleagues for the experience and learnings for the past year. However, during the exit interview, E said while indeed he is grateful to the company and his colleagues, he will be filing a constructive dismissal case because according to him, he was repeatedly humiliated by his immediate superior, who did not address the occupational safety and health concerns in the manufacturing plant where he is assigned; and despite working in the company for a year, he still has no employment contract. Are these claims sufficient to establish constructive dismissal against the company?

    Phoenix

    Dear Phoenix,

    According to the Supreme Court, constructive dismissal exists when continued employment has become so unbearable because of acts of clear discrimination, insensibility or disdain by the employer, that the employee has no choice but to resign; and that the test of constructive dismissal is whether a reasonable person in the employee’s position would have felt compelled to give up his position under the circumstances.

    Since mere allegation is not evidence, there must be proof establishing that the employee resigned because staying on the job had become impossible or unreasonable. The complainant must, therefore, prove by substantial evidence that he/she was illegally dismissed.

    Substantial evidence is that amount of relevant evidence that a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to justify a conclusion. Thus, the employee, E, has to show that his resignation was not of his own free will and constituted constructive dismissal. This means E should show that the company took clear actions to dismiss him, or that they intended for him to be separated. Otherwise, a mere narration, without corroborating proof, will be insufficient to sustain a claim of constructive dismissal against the company.

    (Jose Edwin G. Esico versus Alphaland Corporation, et al., G.R. No. 216716, 17 November 2021)

    Atty. Kathy Larios