CADENA: Unchained?
The Filipino people have heard enough promises of accountability after the fact. It is time to make accountability visible before the fact.
Text size
The Filipino people have heard enough promises of accountability after the fact. It is time to make accountability visible before the fact.
There is something profoundly ironic about a transparency measure sitting in legislative limbo.
After extensive deliberations and hearings, the CADENA bill — the Citizen Access and Disclosure of Expenditures for National Accountability Act — was approved by the Senate on third and final reading in December 2025 by a unanimous 17–0 vote. Yet months later, it remains pending in the House of Representatives.
What is keeping the House from taking it up?
Is it the impeachment proceedings? The budget hearings? The crowded legislative calendar? Perhaps. These are legitimate matters requiring Congress’ attention. But they do not adequately explain why a measure intended to strengthen transparency in government spending continues to wait without any clear assurance of when the House will deliberate on it.
CADENA must not become another Mona Lisa — a bill that sits quietly in the halls of Congress, admired, discussed, and perhaps eventually forgotten, until it simply dies there.
The bill deserves better. More importantly, the Filipino taxpayer deserves better.
CADENA is timely because the country has been shaken by allegations and controversies involving public spending, including questions surrounding flood control projects. These controversies have done more than expose possible irregularities. They have deepened a much larger problem: the erosion of public trust.
People are increasingly asking: Where did the money go? Who received it? How much was actually spent? Were the projects really completed? Were the costs reasonable? Who approved them?
These should not be questions that citizens can answer only after a scandal erupts.
Government information should be available while transactions are taking place — not years later, when investigators have to reconstruct what happened.
That is the importance of CADENA. At its core is a simple democratic principle: public money should be publicly traceable.
By requiring government expenditures and procurement information to be made accessible through a digital dashboard, CADENA can give citizens, journalists, auditors, civil society, and other watchdogs the ability to examine government spending more systematically.
It is not a magic wand against corruption. Transparency alone will not put corrupt officials behind bars. But corruption thrives where information is difficult to obtain, transactions are difficult to trace, and accountability comes only after the money is long gone.
The country needs to move from a culture of post-scandal investigation to pre-scandal transparency.
This is also an economic issue.
Corruption does not merely steal pesos from government coffers. It wastes infrastructure spending, distorts competition, discourages legitimate businesses, and undermines confidence in institutions. When citizens and investors begin to believe that government contracts and expenditures cannot be trusted, the damage extends far beyond the transactions themselves.
At a time when the Philippines is trying to sustain economic growth, attract investment, and restore confidence, strengthening the credibility of public institutions should be made part of economic policy. And technology now makes greater transparency possible.
The question is no longer whether government information can be digitized. The question is whether government is willing to make that information accessible, understandable, and auditable.
CADENA offers an opportunity to do exactly that.
The House, of course, has every right — and responsibility — to scrutinize the Senate version of the CADENA bill. It can amend it, improve it, strengthen safeguards, and address implementation concerns.
But deliberation is not the same as delay.
If there are weaknesses, debate them. If there are technical difficulties, resolve them. If provisions need strengthening, amend them.
What should not happen is for the bill to remain untouched indefinitely.
The Senate has already sent an unusually powerful message: 17 senators voted for it, and not one voted against it.
That does not bind the House to accept the measure unchanged. But surely it deserves the House’s serious and timely attention.
The longer CADENA remains unattended, the more difficult it becomes for the public to understand why.
And perception matters.
In an environment already clouded by allegations of questionable government expenditures, legislative inaction on a transparency measure can unintentionally create precisely the suspicion that transparency is supposed to dispel.
The House should therefore act — not because the Senate has acted, but because the country needs stronger mechanisms of public accountability.
Passing CADENA would not solve corruption overnight. It would, however, send an unmistakable message that government has nothing to hide and that citizens have a legitimate right to know how their money is being spent.
The Filipino people have heard enough promises of accountability after the fact. It is time to make accountability visible before the fact.
Do not let CADENA become another Mona Lisa — beautifully conceived, displayed for all to see, but never allowed to fulfill its purpose.
When power controls the purse, transparency should control power.
