Sunday, 30 August 2026
Nasdaq -0.52%
Subscribe NowSupport Us

Daily Tribune

Daily Tribune
Subscribe
Sunday, 30 August 2026
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Business
  • Life
  • Show
  • Sports
  • Global Goals
  • Obituary
Partner feature

The Philippines' leading digital newspaper.

News
  • Headlines
  • Page three
  • Metro
  • Nation
  • World
  • Dyaryo Tirada
  • SONATOTOO (archive)
Opinion
  • All columnists
  • Editorials
  • Guest essays
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Scuttlebutt
Business
  • Shipping
  • Portraits
  • Pep
  • Business Advisories
  • Technology (Tech Talks)
Life
  • Show
  • Food & Drink
  • Getaways
  • Arts & Culture
  • Social Set
  • Spaces
  • Fashion & Beauty
  • The Edit
  • Top Form
  • Next Gen
  • Sacred Space
  • Project Larawan
  • Snaps
Sports
  • Hoops
  • Volley
  • Golf
  • Goal
  • Boxing
  • Tennis
  • Esports
  • Blast

Company

  • SONATOTOO archive
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Privacy
  • Subscribe
  • Support Us

© 2026 Daily Tribune · tribune.net.ph · Powered by Quintype

OPINION

Corruption, politicking

This is why he — Marcos —- chooses relief projects, which he can take credit for, albeit in reality they do not provide a permanent panacea.

Atty. Edward P. Chico·30 August 2026, 10:04 pm·1 MIN READ

Corruption, politicking

(August 29 2026) MMDA personnel monitor the operation of a pumping station along E. Rodriguez Avenue in Quezon City on Saturday, August 29, 2026, amid flooding caused by continuous rains in Metro Manila. The pumping station is operating to mitigate the flood in the area. Photo/Analy Labor

PHOTO courtesy of Analy Labor for DAILY TRIBUNE

Text size
Partner feature

Stay informed

Get Daily Tribune in your inbox

Breaking news, opinion, and business coverage for readers in the Philippines and abroad.

Subscribe to the newsletter

What's your take?

Share

Google Preferred Sources

Get more Daily Tribune stories in your search results

Add Daily Tribune as a preferred source on Google Search.

Add to Google
Partner feature
Partner feature
Partner feature

Share

  • P107.4 billion flood control
  • 2027 flood control budget
  • Philippines flood control master plan

The P107.4 billion for flood control projects under the proposed 2027 National Expenditure Program (NEP) represents the lowest funding for flood control since 2019. However, just like those that came before it, this allocation is bound to fail because it will not really address the root cause of the problem, which is the lack of a unified master plan needed to solve it.

While concerned officials promise to incorporate definitive geographic coordinates and an explicit, pre-mapped program of work, I still don’t expect them to truly provide a comprehensive, large-scale, all-inclusive plan to pursue flood control and tackle other related issues. And I believe they do that deliberately.

For the longest time, the government has historically prioritized fragmented, short-term “relief projects” over cohesive, long-term regional planning. In fact, many recommendations made by experts in the past were canceled, delayed, or never fully implemented by changing administrations.

For example, we do have pumping stations everywhere, but they cannot function properly because small and clogged drainage systems severely degrade them. As a result, water cannot efficiently reach the station to be pumped away, resulting in severe localized flooding upstream.

In addition, since our dikes are incomplete or contain gaps, the water pumped into the river simply flows back into the low-lying inland areas through those gaps. Sadly, the fact that we do not have retention tanks or retarding basins to temporarily store peak volumes of floodwater surely exacerbates the problem.

Meanwhile, appropriate agencies never really pursue nature-based solutions. They don’t have comprehensive wetland restoration, mangrove rehabilitation or even stream re-meandering projects to absorb storm surges and slow down runoff velocity. Heck, they couldn’t even manage our solid waste efficiently.

So, the question now is why couldn’t they do what they’re supposed to do? Well, I can only think of two concrete answers.

Firstly, they don’t really want to solve the problem because if they do, allocations would stop. If they come up with fragmented funding and delayed project phases instead, appropriations continue, allowing them to make insertions here and there. So everyone remains happy.

Secondly, there is a problem with continuity. Since experts claim it takes 15-20 years to fully solve the flooding problem through comprehensive, long-term master plans, no President is willing to make sacrifices because results would be felt years after he is gone from office.

This is why he — Marcos — chooses relief projects, which he can take credit for, albeit in reality they do not provide a permanent panacea. In sum, it’s really all about corruption and too much politicking. Plain and simple.

Also read

Flood control makes P107.4B comeback
NATION

Flood control makes P107.4B comeback

The government has allocated P107.4 billion for flood control projects under the proposed 2027 national budget, a year after the program…

Jerod Orcullo·11 August 2026

Also read

DBM earmarks P107.4B for flood control
NEWS

DBM earmarks P107.4B for flood control

After allocating no funds for flood control in the current national budget, the Department of Budget and Management (DBM) said Tuesday that…

Jerod Orcullo·12 August 2026