VP lawyers lashback: ‘It’s prudence’



CAGAYAN DE ORO CITY — The Association of Firearms and Ammunition Dealers of the Philippines (AFAD) has brought its…

‘The Filipino people will realize that their money is just being absorbed into the pockets of our legislators and our…

The Philippines and the United Kingdom (UK) have begun formal negotiations for a proposed Status of Visiting Forces…

The Philippines and the United Kingdom have formally started negotiations for a proposed Status of Visiting Forces…

Former Senate President Franklin Drilon warned Wednesday that a prolonged impeachment trial of Vice President Sara…
The defense team of Vice President Sara Duterte said Sunday that the proposed 14 August schedule for the stipulation of documents in her impeachment trial was due to the limited availability of its lawyers, rejecting suggestions that it was using the process to delay proceedings.
Defense panel deputy spokesperson Atty. Justin Gular said the 16-member legal team had already adjusted its schedules and could accommodate the document comparison only by the aforementioned date.
“This is not a delay. That’s really the trial system,” Gular said in a radio interview, explaining that stipulation involves identifying and authenticating documents that both sides intend to use as evidence.
Gular said the defense was being cautious because parties are bound by documents they agree to stipulate. “The defense has all the right to be prudent and careful,” Gular explained.
The deputy spokesperson added that the scheduling of the stipulation would not prevent Commission on Audit auditor Xylene del Campo from continuing her testimony.
“We understand people will always have their aspersions, comments, and perceptions, and, really, we respect that,” he said when asked about allegations that the defense was deliberately dragging out the proceedings.
The prosecution has said the defense’s refusal to stipulate to the documents could slow the trial, after the Senate impeachment court spent hours during previous hearings comparing copies of documentary evidence.
The impeachment court on Wednesday ordered the prosecution and defense to compare their copies of 845 acknowledgment receipts linked to a P125 million OVP confidential-fund allocation for the last quarter of 2022.
The prosecution has said it has more than 4,000 acknowledgment receipts that it wants marked as evidence. It has argued that requiring a witness to identify each document in court would consume significant trial time.