More flood control funds to be returned to National Treasury — DOJ



According to the department, the initiative aims to improve internal coordination and build a more responsive…

'You won’t see the mastermind or the person who gave the order at the crime scene, but he was the one who gave the…

The camp of former House Speaker Martin Romualdez expressed confidence that recent recantations by several witnesses…

President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr. kept his administration’s action-oriented agenda moving last week, placing flood…
The Department of Justice (DOJ) is optimistic that more funds allegedly diverted through anomalous flood control projects would be recovered and returned to the National Treasury.
This was according to DOJ spokesperson Atty. Polo Martinez saying they expect additional recoveries following the return of more than P841 million already remitted to the government.
Martinez, responding to a question during a press briefing on whether more individuals would return money allegedly linked to the controversy, said the DOJ could not say for certain but remained hopeful.
“We cannot say that. What we know is some P800 million had been returned. And I believe that there are more. The Department actually expects more. So that’s been returned to the Treasury. It was already returned to the national coffers,” said Martinez.
Earlier, the DOJ announced that the government had recovered more than P841 million in cash from individuals allegedly involved in the controversial flood control projects.
In a previous statement, the DOJ said, “To date, P841 million in cash has been recovered from those involved and remitted to the National Treasury through the Land Bank of the Philippines”
It said recovery efforts are continuing as authorities seek the return of more public funds allegedly lost to the flood control projects.
“The work continues. We will recover the people’s money,” the DOJ said.
The department also said it would continue coordinating with the Office of the Ombudsman in pursuing cases arising from the investigation while respecting the anti-graft body’s constitutional mandate.
It added that where the law places a case in their hands, they will build it to the standards that stand in court.