Panelo raises malicious prosecution



The Office of the Ombudsman is now investigating at least P60 billion worth of flood control projects in Cebu.

CAGAYAN DE ORO CITY — A person of interest in the killing of an overseas Filipino worker (OFW) whose mutilated body was…

Whatever course is chosen must preserve continuity without prejudging Commissioner Regalado.

Police recovered a stolen cellphone in Taguig City after tracking the suspect’s movements through closed-circuit…

Senator Loren Legarda on Friday urged the public not to draw "unwarranted conclusions" from her reported trip abroad,…
Former Chief Presidential Legal Counsel Salvador Panelo on Wednesday said that Vice President Sara Duterte could file a complaint for malicious prosecution against the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) if the agency fails to produce evidence after completing its investigation into her alleged assassination threat.
Speaking to reporters after the impeachment trial, Panelo said the NBI could face legal consequences if it pursues a case without sufficient basis.
“Of course, malicious prosecution,” Panelo said when asked if the Vice President could sue the NBI if its investigators fail to establish their case in three to six months.
Asked to explain, Panelo said: “Malisyosong pag-uusig na wala namang ebidensya (Malicious prosecution without evidence). Crime ‘yun. That’s a crime under the revised state of the law.”
NBI director Melvin Matibag testified this week before the Senate impeachment court that the bureau expects to complete its investigation into Duterte’s alleged assassination threat within three to six months.
During cross-examination, Matibag was asked whether the NBI could identify the alleged assassin whom Duterte supposedly contracted within that timeframe. He replied that the likelihood was “6 to 7” on a scale of one to 10.
The NBI opened its investigation following Duterte’s 23 November 2024 online press conference, during which she said she had instructed someone to kill President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., First Lady Liza Araneta-Marcos, and former Speaker Martin Romualdez if a plot against her succeeded.
Duterte has since maintained that her remarks were taken out of context and did not constitute a direct threat. The NBI, meanwhile, has said its investigation seeks to determine whether criminal liability exists.