Telcos seek moratorium on ‘Konektado’ law amid energy crisis



‘There was a time when I felt pressured by that title because it came with so much responsibility. Now, I carry it with…
The Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) Wedding Fair opened with the Tatak Pinoy Bridal Fashion Show at the SMX…
The Philippine Sports Commission (PSC) is adjusting the age bracket for this year’s Batang Pinoy in Bacolod City as…

BAGUIO CITY — SM City Baguio formally opens its doors to chess enthusiasts as it hosted a chess tournament over the…

If there's one thing Gen Z loves, it's stories that feel real — friendships that become family, dreams worth fighting…
The Philippine Chamber of Telecommunication Operators (PCTO) is calling for a moratorium on the issuance of policies under the Konektadong Pinoy Act amid a national energy emergency.
“The PCTO respectfully appeals that, for the duration of the ongoing national energy emergency, the Government refrain from unduly rushing the release of any circular, directive, or policy that would materially affect the telecommunications industry,” the group said in a statement on Wednesday.
“A moratorium and proper extension of time for stakeholder consultations is not merely a procedural accommodation, it is a practical necessity,” it added.
While recognizing the law’s push to expand digital connectivity, the PCTO urged regulators to be cautious in releasing policies during the crisis.
“The overriding urgency at this time is to ensure that the telecommunications industry remains operational, financially viable, and fully capable of keeping critical telecom infrastructure functional and resilient,” it said.
“Stability in the sector is not an industry interest alone, it is a public interest, as connectivity has proven indispensable in times of national crisis.”
The group also pushed for extended consultations on the access list, including policy, infrastructure sharing, cybersecurity, and the Spectrum Management and Policy Framework (SMPF).
It stressed the need to fully use the one year allowed under the law for issuing the SMPF, warning that “rushing the SMPF process risks producing a framework that is inadequately aligned with technical realities, market conditions, and the long-term interests of both industry and the public.”