Symbol of wasteful spending?

Symbol of wasteful spending? | Daily Tribune

The New Senate Building (NSB) in Fort Bonifacio, Taguig, designed by AECOM, serves as a modern, sustainable, and iconic symbol of the Republic of the Philippines, inspired by the Philippine flag’s sun, the Banaue Rice Terraces, and the barong Tagalog, with its four interconnected towers representing the four pillars of democracy.

Key symbolism and features

1. Four Pillars of Democracy: The four interconnected towers represent Justice, Equality, Freedom, and Representation arranged in a symmetrical and balanced masterplan to reflect these principles.

2. Cultural Identity: The building’s facade features a brise soleil design inspired by the barong Tagalog, symbolizing the nation’s culture, honor, and formal traditional attire.

3. National Heritage and Geography: The internal greening and facade are inspired by the Banaue Rice Terraces, highlighting the country’s natural beauty and heritage.

4. Sustainability and Future Ready: As a green eco-conscious structure, it represents a “green government” with an energy-saving system aiming for certification by the Philippine Green Building Council.

5. Unity and Stability: The design, which includes a central plenary hall, brings the Senate into a permanent, secure, and modern home representing stability after years of leasing space.

The foregoing symbolism is intended to boost the Philippines’ image as a modern democratic nation. However, its perceived utility is currently overshadowed by concerns over a massive budget inflation — escalating from an initial P8.9 billion to potentially over P27 billion — including investigations into alleged overpricing that risk damaging the nation’s international image by highlighting issues of governance and fiscal management.

Transparency and cost

1. Soaring Costs: The project, initiated in 2017, saw its estimated cost balloon to over P23.3 billion, and potentially up to P27 billion, leading to a temporary suspension of construction in 2024 for a review.

2. Transparency issues: Senator Alan Cayetano raised concerns about the “dramatic” budget increase, calling the final price a “moving target” and questioning the management of the project by the Department of Public Works and HIghways (DPWH).

3. Controversy: The involvement of contractors previously linked to alleged overpricing, such as Hilmarc’s Construction Corp., has intensified scrutiny and public debate.

Image building of the Philippines

1. Negative Impact: The controversy, marked by public arguments between senators and investigators on the rising costs, presents a picture of inefficiency and potential corruption which could negatively impact the Philippines’ international reputation in infrastructure management and fiscal responsibility.

2. Positive Potential: If completed with full transparency and high quality, the landmark building could still showcase the Philippines as a nation investing in modern, and democratic infrastructure.

The project’s ultimate impact on the Philippines’ image hinges on whether the final construction is perceived as a justified investment in national infrastructure or a symbol of wasteful spending, a concern that has prompted calls for a comprehensive audit and a focus on “eyes on the ball” to complete the project.

The building is designed to be a monument that fosters public trust and reflects a forward-looking, resilient Philippines — as a beacon of hope for the next century.

Email: arturobesana2@gmail.com