ICI denies ‘cherry-picking’ probe targets: ‘We follow the evidence’

Atty. Brian Hosaka

Atty. Brian Hosaka

What was billed as a vehicle for accountability instead risks being seen as a containment mechanism, one that addressed…

Authorities have been asked to retrieve several luxury vehicles allegedly linked to former congressman Zaldy Co,…

Assistant to the Ombudsman Mico Clavano said on Monday that they were actively reviewing the documents submitted by the…

The commission has turned over documents to the Ombudsman, including nine referrals involving 65 individuals.
Philippine National Police (PNP) chief P/Gen. Jose Melencio Nartatez Jr. on Sunday highlighted the role of police…
The Independent Commission for Infrastructure (ICI) vehemently denied allegations from anti-corruption group Artikulo Onse that it is “cherry-picking” cases to protect allies of the current administration.
The denial came after Artikulo Onse claimed that the ICI’s recommendation to indict former Department of Public Works and Highways officials was merely “for show,” accusing the commission of offering up “sacrificial lambs” to create the appearance of accountability while sparing influential figures.
ICI Executive Director Atty. Brian Keith Hosaka rejected the accusation, saying the commission’s work is guided solely by facts.
“The commission is continuously investigating and doing case build-up grounded on evidence,” Hosaka said.
He added that anyone implicated by the commission’s findings will be included in its report and referral to the Office of the Ombudsman.
Hosaka emphasized that the ICI’s work is not influenced by political considerations.