Tarlac mayor tied to asphalt scandal



The “no makeup makeup” look just found its new bestie.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has fined Fast Coin Lending Corp. P1.1 million for harassing borrowers and…

Millions of electricity consumers will continue to be protected from service disconnections and will have more time to…
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has fined Fast Coin Lending Corp. P1.1 million for harassing borrowers and…

Both of Solaire Resort’s Metro Manila properties have once again received awards from Wine Spectator for its signature…
A Commission on Audit (CoA) has linked Tarlac Mayor Maria Cristina C. Angeles to a series of irregularities in multi-million peso asphalting projects, including unauthorized contracts, double payments and conflict of interest involving her husband’s firm.
Fraud Audit Report No. 2025-003 revealed that road projects were implemented without the required authorization from the Sangguniang Panlungsod. Auditors also flagged double payments for overlapping portions of asphalt work, resulting in unjustified disbursements.
In a major ethical breach, the city government sourced construction materials from Northern Builders, a company owned by Mayor Angeles’ spouse. CoA said that this conflict of interest casts a shadow over the entire procurement process.
Moreover, check payments totaling P21.23 million were released even before the preparation of official disbursement vouchers, which CoA noted as a hallmark of potentially fraudulent transactions.
The mayor was also tied to another questionable project, a P41.2-million solid waste hauling contract flagged by CoA as disadvantageous to the government. The audit revealed that the pre-procurement conference appeared to be fabricated, with an attendance sheet dated a year after the supposed meeting.
The Bids and Awards Committee further failed to evaluate documents properly, awarding the contract to a supplier that lacked the required technical qualifications.
CoA concluded that the city government extended unwarranted benefits to the ineligible supplier and directly held Angeles liable for approving the irregular procurement.
The report called on appropriate agencies to investigate the mayor and city officials involved for possible legal and administrative sanctions.