Mayor Pacquiao, dads face graft complaint

(File photo) Office of Ombudsman

(File photo) Office of Ombudsman

The Department of Finance (DoF) expects to generate about P30 billion from the planned sale of two major…
Agents from the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) raided an illegal gambling operation disguised as a video game…

Bureau of Corrections director general Gregorio Pio P. Catapang Jr. has directed the conduct of comprehensive medical…

Senator Christopher “Bong” Go has filed a bill that would require government agencies to expand digital payment…

The country has struggled to make progress because officials seek to enrich themselves through public office, Ombudsman…
The Office of the Ombudsman has directed General Santos City Mayor Lorelie Pacquiao and eight members of the city council to respond to a graft complaint regarding an alleged irregularity in the proposed P2.3-billion “mallengke” deal.
The complaint, lodged last year by city councilor Jose Edmar Yumang, claims that the respondents violated the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act (Republic Act 3019) over an unsolicited proposal from Robinsons Land Corporation (RLC) to redevelop the city’s central public market.
The complaint alleges that the approval process for RLC’s proposal was not conducted transparently, and that certain officials may have bypassed legal requirements for public bidding and proper consultation.
The deal, valued at P2.3 billion, involves RLC’s plan to overhaul the city’s public market, or “mallengke,” which has long been a vital trade hub for the residents of General Santos.
Yumang contends that the respondents did not act in the best interest of the public and may have shown favoritism towards the private corporation.
In addition to Mayor Pacquiao, the complaint names Councilors Dominador Lagare Jr., Jose Orlando Acharon, Maria Lourdes Casabuena, Elizabeth Bagonoc, Richard L. Atendido, Virginia Llido, Lucio Cawayan Sr. and Elijah Joanne Polistico, as well as members of the Local Development Council and the negotiating committee.
These officials are accused of participating in the process that led to the approval of RLC’s proposal, despite concerns raised about its legality.
The Ombudsman has instructed the respondents to file their counter-affidavits within 10 days of receiving the order, along with supporting documents and affidavits from their witnesses. The Ombudsman is expected to review all submissions before determining whether to proceed with formal charges or drop the case.
Councilor Atendido, one of the named respondents, confirmed that they had filed a motion for an extension, as allowed by the Ombudsman’s office.