Media protection pushed on Press Freedom Day

PRESS on National Press Freedom Day serves as a reminder that a free press is not merely a privilege to celebrate, but a fundamental right to defend, protect and exercise.
DAILY TRIBUNE images

PRESS on National Press Freedom Day serves as a reminder that a free press is not merely a privilege to celebrate, but a fundamental right to defend, protect and exercise.
DAILY TRIBUNE images
Rain equivalent to 10 days of precipitation battered the City of Manila on Saturday, 29 August triggering widespread…

The Department of Justice Action Center (DoJAC) and prosecution offices nationwide are now accepting anti-bullying…

The Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD) said Sunday it is expanding resource augmentation to assist…

Both nations pledged to build a more sustainable and agile partnership grounded in international law, freedom of…

Nature does not stop for our convenience, and certainly, we cannot control the rain. But we can control how vulnerable…
The Commission on Human Rights (CHR) joined the nation in observing National Press Freedom Day on Sunday, renewing its call to protect Filipino media practitioners and safeguard press freedom.
“A free and independent press is vital to a functioning democracy, empowering communities, holding power accountable, and bringing attention to the realities faced by the country’s marginalized and disadvantaged sectors,” the CHR said in a statement.
National Press Freedom Day is observed every 30 August, with the commission noting that press freedom in the Philippines continues to face serious challenges.
Citing the country’s 114th ranking in the 2026 World Press Freedom Index, the CHR stressed that the lack of accountability for crimes against media workers perpetuates a dangerous cycle of impunity, contributing to a volatile media landscape in the Philippines.
“The CHR thus urges the State to prioritize swift justice for victims and their families,” the institution said.
“Red-tagging and other forms of intimidation also threaten journalists and the public’s right to information,” it added.
Several forms of threats
The nation’s human rights institution, however, noted that the Supreme Court (SC) has ruled that red-tagging, vilification, labeling, and guilt by association threaten a person’s life, liberty, and security.
The CHR’s National Inquiry on Red-Tagging likewise found journalists and media practitioners among those frequently targeted, particularly for reporting deemed critical of government programs and policies. It recommended legislation penalizing red-tagging as a distinct offense.
“As the country’s national human rights institution, the CHR continues to strengthen mechanisms for the protection and welfare of media workers,” the human rights commission stated.
Its partnership with the Presidential Task Force on Media Security supports information sharing, case building, and assistance for affected journalists.
Meanwhile, the CHR reiterated its support for the decriminalization of libel and cyberlibel, urging Congress to consolidate and prioritize these measures and replace imprisonment with proportionate civil remedies.
“At the same time, measures against disinformation must safeguard constitutional rights,” the CHR said, noting the proposed Digital Media Anti-False Information Act, which imposes prison terms and fines on individuals found guilty of spreading false information.
The institution, however, recognized that emerging technologies, particularly artificial intelligence, pose new risks to press freedom.