Investigators estimated the restaurant served ant-topped menu items around 12,200 times, generating roughly 120 million won in sales. They further alleged that approximately 49,000 ants were used across the restaurant's tasting menus, including desserts such as sherbet.
The defense largely accepted the allegations but challenged the prosecution's calculations. Lawyers argued that ants were only added for diners who agreed to try them, claiming roughly 60 percent of guests accepted the ingredient. Prosecutors, they said, assumed every customer was served ants, resulting in an inflated estimate.
The defense also emphasized that the ant garnish appeared only on a handful of courses within the restaurant's 15-course tasting menu, adding that upscale restaurants in countries such as Denmark, the United Kingdom, and Australia have similarly incorporated ants into their cuisine.
The court is expected to hand down its decision on 2 September, in a closely watched case that has reignited debate over whether culinary innovation should outpace existing food regulations.