Teenage angst and negligent gun owners
If a legally registered firearm is left unsecured and is used in a crime, the registered owner must face severe criminal charges as an accessory.
Daily TribuneIf a legally registered firearm is left unsecured and is used in a crime, the registered owner must face severe criminal charges as an accessory.
Teenage angst is a universal phase of adolescence, but in the Philippines, it becomes fatal in the company of negligent gun owners.
The devastating school shooting at San Jose National High School in Tacloban City, Leyte, has shattered the sanctuary of the Philippine classroom. On 22 June, two Grade 9 students — aged 14 and 15 — carefully planned and executed an attack that left three students dead and 20 others injured.
This tragedy forces us to confront a terrifying reality: We are no longer any different from the United States, a nation long plagued by school massacres. The illusion of domestic safety has been irrevocably broken.
As a nation mourns, the public discourse has focused on predictable debates over school bullying, violent video games and lowering the age of criminal responsibility.
Yet, these arguments ignore the most damning reality: Two children were able to easily obtain a .38-caliber revolver and a 9mm Glock pistol. This horror is not an isolated anomaly. It is the inevitable, lethal collision of adolescent rage and accessible firepower. It represents a systemic failure to hold legal gun owners accountable and to control the proliferation of loose firearms.
Initial police investigation revealed the tragedy was premeditated for over a month. Yet, dark intent alone cannot kill on this scale; access is the ultimate catalyst.
The tracking of the weapons reads like a case study in systemic negligence. The 9mm Glock was traced to a Philippine National Police (PNP) officer, the aunt of one suspect. While the .38-caliber revolver was linked to a private security agency in Cebu City.
When state-issued and commercially regulated firearms can be casually taken by adolescents from household drawers, the distinction between “legal” and “loose” firearms completely evaporates. This is criminal negligence. If those trained and licensed by the state to handle security cannot secure their lethal inventory, then our gun ownership frameworks are functionally failing our citizens.
The ease with which these adolescents were able to secure military-grade and commercial firearms reflects a systemic national failure to regulate unlicensed weaponry. Official data from the PNP underscores the scale of this enforcement gap: between August 2025 and February 2026, authorities arrested over 5,000 individuals for illegal possession under Republic Act 10591 and confiscated more than 15,000 unlicensed firearms nationwide. An additional 4,684 weapons were seized for regulatory violations in early 2026 alone.
This high density of unaccounted-for firearms directly correlates with public safety risks, demonstrating how a proliferation once confined to urban transit and road rage incidents has now compromised the security of our educational institutions.
However, seizures alone are a reactionary bandage on a hemorrhaging artery. We must target the source of the bleeding: Careless legal gun owners who feed the black market. Owning a firearm is a grave privilege, not a casual right. Adolescent rage will always exist, but it only becomes fatal when adults leave the keys to the armory within arm’s reach.
To prevent another Leyte, the state must implement strict liability laws. If a legally registered firearm is left unsecured and is used in a crime, the registered owner must face severe criminal charges as an accessory.
Furthermore, the PNP must enforce mandatory, verified storage solutions — such as biometric safes — and conduct unannounced compliance audits.
Thoughts and prayers will not secure a household drawer. Until we penalize the adults who make adolescent rage lethal, teenage angst will continue to be a death sentence for our children.
