SC: ‘Sweetheart’ theory not justifiable



A state auditor testifying on the confidential funds told the Senate impeachment court on Monday that it was only under…

The Department of Agriculture is asking the Supreme Court to reconsider its decision striking down the…

A former Commission on Audit (COA) official testified before the Senate impeachment court on Monday that the Office of…

The Sandiganbayan Second Division has denied prosecutors' request to dismiss former Department of Public Works and…

TACLOBAN CITY — The leadership of the House of Representatives is "very happy" with the performance of the prosecution…
The Supreme Court (SC) has ruled that a victim’s admission of being in a relationship with her abuser does not imply consent to sex, emphasizing that clear and convincing evidence of consent is always required.
In a decision penned by retired Associate Justice Mario V. Lopez and dated 3 February 2025, the SC’s Second Division found Jhopet Hernandez Toralde guilty of raping a 14-year-old girl.
Court records show that Toralde arrived unannounced at the victim’s house one night. Finding her alone, he insisted on having sex, but she refused, citing her menstrual period. According to testimony, Toralde then threatened to show her family a video of them kissing, and out of fear, she relented.
Two days later, the victim’s grandmother noticed blood on her undershirt and questioned her. The victim disclosed that Toralde had forced her to have sex, prompting them to report the incident to the police.