
The Trump administration on Monday launched a government-wide campaign against the International Criminal Court (ICC),…

NEW DELHI, India (AFP) — Nine workers were killed at a waste-to-energy plant in western India after a garbage heap…

A number of the victims were found near a fire exit that authorities believe may have been blocked.

Iran’s Revolutionary Guards said they had struck US military targets and bases in Jordan, Bahrain and Kuwait.

Qatar's government on Sunday announced the death of former leader Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa Al Thani, who led the…

The Port of Balboa, formerly managed by CK Hutchison Holdings, based in Hong Kong, located at the entrance to the Panama Canal in Panama City, on March 12, 2025.
MARTIN BERNETTI / AFP
What's your take?
Google Preferred Sources
Get more Daily Tribune stories in your search results
Add Daily Tribune as a preferred source on Google Search.
Continue reading
HONG KONG, China (AFP) — Stocks in Hong Kong conglomerate CK Hutchison tumbled Friday after Chinese officials overseeing the city reposted a newspaper opinion piece blasting the sale of its lucrative Panama Canal ports following pressure from United States (US) President Donald Trump.
The president has complained that China controls the vital waterway and the US was overpaying to use it, even refusing to rule out a military invasion of Panama to regain control.
Last week the business empire built by Hong Kong’s richest man Li Ka-shing sold its port operators business, including those in the canal, in a $22.8 billion deal with a US-led consortium saying it was purely commercial and not related to recent political news.
But the Hong Kong and Macao Work Office on Thursday republished in full a newspaper op-ed that demanded the firm choose “which side it stands on.”
“Trump and the US did not treat this transaction as a normal commercial move and blatantly interfered, using it to spread global hegemony,” said the article, first published in Hong Kong’s Ta Kung Pao earlier that day.
“The US will definitely use (the Canal) to push a political agenda, and Chinese shipping trade there is set to be constrained.”
The article said it was understandable for internet users to lambast the deal as “spineless kowtowing,” “putting profit above all,” “ignoring national interests... and betraying and selling out all Chinese people.”
A company facing such a major decision should think hard and “decide what its position is, and which side it stands on,” the article concluded.