“And the signature of Vice President Sara Duterte, does it appear?” Poa asked.
“I did not see her signature,” Galvez said.
Presiding Officer Francis Escudero later confirmed that Sara Duterte’s signature did not appear in BPI’s inventory of pre-marked transaction documents, including those covering the opening and termination of time deposits and requests for manager’s checks.
Under BPI rules, either holder of a joint “or” account may transact independently. But Galvez confirmed that, in this case, Rodrigo Duterte could transact alone while Sara Duterte could not transact without the former president’s consent or signature.
Poa also sought to present a February 2026 letter he said he sent to BPI as Sara Duterte’s authorized representative to verify the existence of the account and other accounts.
The letter stated that the inquiry was solely for verification and should not be construed as an admission or confirmation of ownership, authority or beneficial interest in any account.
No recollection of joint account
Sen.-judge Risa Hontiveros pressed the defense on whether it was effectively pointing to Rodrigo Duterte as the person who owned and controlled a transaction involving a P41-million manager’s check.
“So, regarding this letter you sent, Attorney Poa, my understanding from what you have said so far is that the actual owner and the person who controlled the P41-million manager’s check transaction was Rodrigo R. Duterte and not Sara Duterte. Okay, is that correct?” Hontiveros asked in Filipino.