ICC prosecution bucks DU30 evidence bid



Ebdane earns from excise taxes, environmental fees and extraction fees, which are not audited and reported because no…
The Commission on Elections (Comelec) is set to test this weekend the vote counting machines (VCMs) it will use for the…

University of the Philippines Associate Law dean and constitutional law professor Paolo Tamase said Vice President Sara…

The Department of Education (DepEd) needs to transfer more decision-making and resources to schools and allow local…

Department of Health (DoH) must fill thousands of vacant positions in the public health system, as stable jobs at home…
The International Criminal Court (ICC) prosecution has moved to block a bid by former President Rodrigo Duterte’s defense to require expert reports for all open-source and user-generated evidence in his trial.
In a filing dated 9 September 2026, the prosecution argued that such evidence covers a broad range of materials and should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, rather than automatically requiring expert reports.
The prosecution said the party submitting the evidence bears the burden of establishing its relevance and probative value while assessing its potential prejudicial effect.
It described the defense proposal as “unreasonable, unnecessary and against the interests of judicial efficiency,” adding that it was inconsistent with the court’s prior jurisprudence.
The prosecution acknowledged that some open-source and user-generated evidence may require expert examination, particularly when questions arise over whether material was edited or filtered using artificial intelligence tools.