Sara files second perjury case vs Madriaga



Defense counsel Michael Poa on Tuesday denied making a statement attributed to him in a social media post responding to…

The Supreme Court has upheld the conviction of a police officer for psychological violence against his then-pregnant…

The testimony of former Office of the Vice President (OVP) special disbursing officer Gina Acosta strengthens…

President Marcos does not have aby idea about the so-called Leadership Funds, or lump sums in the budget meant for pork…

The Senate impeachment court allowed the prosecution on Monday to question Vice President Sara Duterte’s aide about her…
A second perjury complaint filed by Vice President Sara Duterte against Ramil Madriaga gives him another legal forum to defend statements cited as evidence in an impeachment complaint against her, his lawyers said Tuesday.
“Every proceeding carries its own evidentiary threshold. We welcome the opportunity to confront these accusations at every stage and under every applicable quantum of evidence,” the law firm Palad Lauron Palad & Te said in a statement.
Duterte filed the complaint Monday before the Taguig City Prosecutor’s Office, accusing Madriaga of making false statements in his 11 April supplemental affidavit.
The complaint, filed under Article 183 of the Revised Penal Code, runs to about 1,000 pages and includes Duterte’s sworn testimony, statements from 12 corroborating witnesses, government documents and certifications, as well as messages, photographs and public records, Duterte’s camp said.
Duterte has denied knowing Madriaga and rejected his allegations. She previously filed a perjury complaint against him, also accusing him of making false statements under oath.
“The more forums in which the truth is tested, the more opportunities there are for the truth to prevail,” they said. They cautioned, however, against treating the volume of Duterte’s filing as evidence of the strength of her case.
“A complaint, whether it consists of 10 pages or 1,000, does not establish guilt,” they said. “Neither does the sheer number of affidavits or attachments substitute for competent and credible evidence.”
The lawyers said Madriaga was prepared to answer the complaint with “actual, competent, and independently verifiable evidence.”
“We will meet these accusations with the evidence, the truth and the law,” they said.
Madriaga’s supplemental affidavit was cited as evidence in an impeachment complaint against Duterte.
He has described himself as a former aide and “bagman” of the vice president and made allegations involving cash deliveries, confidential funds and political activities linked to the Duterte family.