Court clears way for Razon firm’s talks with South SOCOTECO II



For decades, one of the principal obstacles to reviving nuclear power in the Philippines was the absence of a modern…

Japanese utility The Kansai Electric Power Co. has taken a 14-percent stake in the 600-megawatt (MW) Wawa Pumped…

Aboitiz Power Corp. delivered a sharp jump in first-half earnings as stronger electricity prices and the ramp-up of new…

Yuchengco-led Maibarara Geothermal Inc. (MGI) has tapped ThermaPrime Drilling Corp. (TDC) for a new exploratory…

Aboitiz Power Corp. delivered a sharp jump in first-half earnings as stronger electricity prices and the ramp-up of new…
General Santos City’s Regional Trial Court (RTC) has cleared the way for South Cotabato II Electric Cooperative (SOCOTECO II) to continue negotiations with Razon-led Ignite Power after denying a bid to halt discussions over the cooperative’s proposed modernization plan temporarily.
In an order dated 6 July, Judge Roel John M. Ladeza of RTC Branch 35 denied the petitioners’ request for a temporary restraining order and a writ of preliminary injunction, allowing negotiations authorized under Board Resolution No. 28 to proceed while the main case remains pending.
The case was filed by six SOCOTECO II member-consumer-owners who sought to stop the cooperative’s board and Ignite Power from pursuing talks stemming from the board resolution, which conditionally accepted Ignite Power’s modernization proposal.
Pursue conversion into a stock cooperative
The petitioners argued that SOCOTECO II should instead pursue conversion into a stock cooperative under the Cooperative Development Authority, claiming this was a right under Presidential Decree No. 269, as amended by Republic Act No. 10531.
The court disagreed, ruling that the petitioners failed to establish a legal basis for the extraordinary relief they sought.
Judge Ladeza found no “clear and unmistakable right” to protect, noting that the law grants cooperatives — not individual members — the option to convert into a stock cooperative. He also said SOCOTECO II’s bylaws do not authorize members to initiate such a conversion.
Alleged harm speculative
The court further ruled that the alleged harm was speculative because Board Resolution No. 28 merely authorized negotiations with Ignite Power and did not prevent the cooperative from considering a future conversion proposal.
“The extraordinary remedies sought cannot issue on the basis of rights that remain subject to judicial determination or injuries that are merely anticipated or contingent,” the order read.