SEC seeks clarity from ERC amid P100-million line fee controversy

Sarangani Energy Corporation
Photo by Antopher Gimena via Gilbert Gorgonio

Sarangani Energy Corporation
Photo by Antopher Gimena via Gilbert Gorgonio

We have no restrictions on foreign capital, and it should be to allow confidence and trust of foreign investors in the…

A 16-year-old Boy Scout was recognized after using his emergency response training to save a drowning man at a resort…

BAGUIO CITY — The long-envisioned Sports University project of Philippine Sports Commission (PSC) chairman Patrick…

The government on Friday filed a protest against state-run publication China Daily’s racist depiction of Filipinos in a…

Prime Energy has brought the Malampaya Deep Water Gas-to-Power Project back online after a month-long maintenance…
The Sarangani Energy Corporation (SEC) is urging a fair resolution from the Energy Regulatory Commission (ERC) amid social media claims that it owes South Cotabato II Electric Cooperative (SOCOTECO II) P100 million in “unpaid line rental fees.”
In a statement, SEC clarified that no such financial obligation exists at present, stressing that the amount being circulated online is “not yet validated” and remains subject to an ongoing ERC review.
“The propriety of such charge has yet to be established, let alone the amount to be paid by SEC,” the company said. “Any determination of payment can only be made once the ERC resolves whether SOCOTECO II has the legal basis to impose said fees.”
The dispute stems from SOCOTECO II’s wheeling charges for electricity transmitted from SEC’s 237-megawatt coal-fired power plant in Maasim, Sarangani Province. The plant supplies power to SOCOTECO II’s franchise areas, including General Santos City, Sarangani Province, and parts of South Cotabato.
SEC underscored that it remains fully compliant with regulatory requirements and continues to cooperate with authorities to settle the issue properly.
The controversy erupted as SOCOTECO II faces mounting operational and financial challenges, including recent public scrutiny following its decision to decline Meralco’s offer of technical assistance.
Energy observers note that the issue has sparked online debate partly because of the corporate ties between SEC and Meralco PowerGen (MGen), both of which are affiliated under different entities of the Alcantara-led Alsons Power Group.
Despite the circulating claims, SEC reaffirmed its commitment to transparency and accountability, calling for responsible information sharing while the ERC determines the legitimate outcome of the dispute.