Sandigan justice: Law, not politics

Amid the public reaction to the plunder case against Senator Rodante Marcoleta, Sandiganbayan Associate Justice Karl Miranda, the Third Division chairperson, on Monday stressed that the anti-graft court’s role is to uphold the law — not to engage in politics.

Miranda said judges are duty-bound to resolve cases based solely on the evidence and the law, not on political affiliations, public opinion, or outside pressure.

“Unlike others who have opinions, the court does not. At this time, everyone has an opinion except the ones who will decide the case,” Miranda said.

“The judiciary does not decide cases based on political affiliation, public opinion, public pressure, or the passions of the moment,” he added.

Marcoleta’s case has drawn polarizing reactions — from support from his fellow members in the Iglesia ni Cristo to opposition from critics of his handling of Senate investigations.

Miranda said the judiciary understands the public’s demand for accountability but emphasized that the courts must remain impartial in dispensing justice.

“The judiciary’s role is to protect the Constitution. It is the nation’s constitutional anchor. Its role is to preserve the law,” he said.

As the country grapples with corruption cases, including the multibillion-peso flood control controversy, Miranda said the Sandiganbayan is prepared to hear cases involving both low-ranking and high-ranking public officials.

“The court is ready. The court will do its duty and render justice by holding the guilty accountable and acquitting the innocent,” he said.

The Third Division is handling Marcoleta’s plunder case, as well as the malversation case involving former senator Ramon “Bong” Revilla Jr.