Skinning a cat



As monsoon rains continue to affect parts of the country, the Manila Electric Company (Meralco) is powering relief for…

WASHINGTON, United States (AFP) — President Donald Trump on Monday again extended a waiver that allows foreign ships to…

MUSCAT (AFP) — Oman on Monday said it was working to contain an oil spill off its southern coast after a tanker ran…

The proposed partnership between South Cotabato II Electric Cooperative (SOCOTECO II) and IGNITE Power will hinge on a…

A 6,000-kilogram shipment of fermented Philippine cacao beans has opened New Zealand as a potential new market for…

A certain lawmaker has been making noise on the House floor, and the target is one of the country’s most storied and most embattled broadcasting empires.
Word reaching Nosy Tarsee’s delicate ears is that this representative is pushing for a full legislative inquiry into how a broadcast network has managed to stay on television screens despite Congress pulling the plug on its legal right to broadcast six whole years ago.
Its cozy blocktime arrangements with a rival network are not quite the innocent airtime rentals they’re being dressed up to be.
“Public airwaves are a privilege, not a right,” the solon reportedly thundered.
The proposed probe reportedly won’t stop at broadcast agreements. Nosy Tarsee hears the inquiry is also considering foreign ownership questions, unsettled labor grievances, and some inconvenient tax conversations that never quite got resolved.
The big question everyone’s whispering in the corridors: Are these partnerships a legal workaround — or a loophole dressed in a broadcast signal?