‘Boying’ hit over Aplasca suspension
‘Boying’ hit over Aplasca suspension
‘Boying’ hit over Aplasca suspension

Police have launched a manhunt and formed a special task force to investigate the fatal shooting of a prominent…

The so-called “Oplan Romanov,” or the alleged covert operation purportedly aimed at eliminating Vice President Sara…

TACLOBAN CITY — Just a week after classes resumed following a fatal mass shooting on campus, officials at San Jose…

The Philippine Charity Sweepstakes Office (PCSO) has signed up another corporation to expand public access to the…

Water reserves at Pantabangan Dam are rising steadily following heavy rains brought by the southwest monsoon and…

OMBUDSMAN Jesus Crispin “Boying” Remulla
What's your take?
Google Preferred Sources
Get more Daily Tribune stories in your search results
Add Daily Tribune as a preferred source on Google Search.
Continue reading
Lawyer Levito Baligod on Sunday criticized Ombudsman Jesus Crispin “Boying” Remulla for the “premature” suspension of acting Senate Sergeant-at-Arms Mao Aplasca over the shooting incident inside the Senate complex on 13 May.
Baligod said Remulla did so despite the absence of any formally filed administrative or criminal complaint.
Remulla justified the suspension by citing Aplasca’s admission that he fired the first warning shot at National Bureau of Investigation personnel near the Senate compound, calling it “unacceptable behavior.”
Meanwhile, Partido Demokratiko Party deputy spokesperson Ferdinand Topacio criticized Justice Secretary Fredderick Vida for warning that Senator Ronald “Bato” Dela Rosa could be arrested if he attempts to leave the country.
Topacio called the remarks “irresponsible,” stressing that no Philippine court has issued an arrest warrant or Hold Departure Order against the senator.
“There is no warrant against Sen. Dela Rosa issued by any court in the Philippines,” Topacio said.
He argued that ICC warrants cannot automatically be enforced in the Philippines without recognition by local courts and warned against misleading the public on the limits of international jurisdiction.