
Police have launched a manhunt and formed a special task force to investigate the fatal shooting of a prominent…

The so-called “Oplan Romanov,” or the alleged covert operation purportedly aimed at eliminating Vice President Sara…

TACLOBAN CITY — Just a week after classes resumed following a fatal mass shooting on campus, officials at San Jose…

The Philippine Charity Sweepstakes Office (PCSO) has signed up another corporation to expand public access to the…

Water reserves at Pantabangan Dam are rising steadily following heavy rains brought by the southwest monsoon and…

ALLOCABLES mastermind? The late DPWH Undersecretary Catalina Cabral testifies before a Senate Blue Ribbon panel hearing on the ‘Floodgate’ scandal. Cabral’s death raised suspicions of foul play due to her key role in the insertions of pork projects in the yearly budget.
Photo by Aram Lascano for DAILY TRIBUNE
What's your take?
Google Preferred Sources
Get more Daily Tribune stories in your search results
Add Daily Tribune as a preferred source on Google Search.
Continue reading
A Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) official said the inclusion of senators and congressmen as project proponents in the 2025 budget proposal stemmed from directives issued by former undersecretary Catalina “Cathy” Cabral.
Engr. Peter Paul Cortez, chief of the DPWH Programming Division, testified that Cabral provided both verbal and documented instructions on which names to encode as project proponents in the agency’s database. Among the documents cited was an alleged order identifying former senator Ramon “Bong” Revilla as the initiator of 10 infrastructure projects in the National Capital Region worth P1 billion.
Under questioning by Sandiganbayan Third Division presiding justice Ronald Moreno, Cortez said such instructions were often not formally logged, as staff routinely followed Cabral’s directives without further verification. He added that requests from lawmakers to be listed as proponents were subject to Cabral’s approval.
Cortez also said the DPWH occasionally submitted errata to the House of Representatives to reflect corrections or additional projects consolidated from regional and district engineering offices.
Moreno noted that identifying lawmakers as project initiators is not inherently unconstitutional, but could become a criminal issue if personal gain is proven. Cortez said he had no knowledge of any profiteering tied to the projects.