The Supreme Court (SC) has admitted a petition filed by a private school teacher seeking to overturn a ruling that cleared Senator Francis “Chiz” Escudero of any violation of election laws over a P30-million campaign donation.

Petitioner John Barry Tayam is asking the high court to review the recommendation of the Commission on Elections’ Political Finance and Affairs Department (PFAD), which earlier terminated its investigation into Escudero and businessman Lawrence Lubiano for lack of evidence.

PFAD had ruled that the donation made by Lubiano—president of Centerways Construction and Development Inc.—was given in his personal capacity, not on behalf of the company. 

The distinction, it said, meant the contribution did not violate the Omnibus Election Code’s prohibition on donations from individuals or entities holding government contracts.

Centerways is among the firms that secured major portions of the government’s flood control projects during the early years of the Marcos administration.

Tayam, however, challenged this interpretation, arguing that Lubiano and the company are effectively one and the same. 

He pointed out that Lubiano is the majority owner of Centerways and derives his income from the firm’s operations, raising questions about whether the donation should be treated as coming from a government contractor.

The teacher is urging the Supreme Court to reverse PFAD’s recommendation and proceed with a deeper investigation into the legality of the contribution.

The admission of the petition means the high court will examine whether election laws were properly applied in distinguishing between personal and corporate donations, particularly in cases involving business owners with government contracts.

A ruling on the case could have broader implications for campaign finance rules and the interpretation of donor restrictions under Philippine election law.