Duterte camp slams House probe as ‘fishing expedition’



Malacañang on Thursday challenged Caloocan Rep. Edgar “Egay” Erice to a face-to-face discussion before the media to…
Malacañang on Thursday maintained that the grave threats case against Vice President Sara Duterte can proceed alongside…

Vice President Sara Duterte has moved to halt a criminal case arising from her 2024 threat against high-ranking…
Vice President Sara Duterte has moved to dismiss the grave threats case filed against her before the Quezon City…

A prosecutor’s social media post about a heated courtroom exchange has prompted the Senate impeachment court to prepare…
The defense team of Vice President Sara Duterte on Wednesday, 25 March, accused the House of Representatives of going beyond the evidence attached to the impeachment complaints, calling lawmakers’ requests for additional documents a “fishing expedition.”
Speaking at a media briefing, Atty. Michael Poa, one of Duterte’s legal counsel, said the House Committee on Justice should limit its review to the complaints and the evidence already submitted.
“If you will go beyond the evidence attached and start asking for documents left and right… that is what we’re saying is a fishing expedition,” Poa said.
The defense argued that the complaints lack sufficient factual basis.
“Kung matatandaan ninyo, wala naman ultimate facts yung complaints,” Poa said. “And then yung mga naka-attach na ebidensya wala rin naman doon na nagpapatunay na may krimen na kagad na nangyari.”
Duterte’s camp said the move to seek additional documents suggests lawmakers are searching for evidence rather than evaluating what has already been filed.
“At malinaw naman sa pinakita na karamihan sa hininging documents ay not within the term of the VP in this case,” Poa added.
The lawyers maintained that the House panel’s role is limited to determining whether the complaints and attached evidence warrant elevation to the plenary and eventual transmission to the Senate for trial.
The defense also questioned what it described as a “mini-trial” being conducted by the House.
“Under these circumstances and considering the public statements made by the chairperson, it appears that the committee intends to conduct a trial,” Atty. Sheila Sison said.
“However, with due respect, the Constitution vests the authority and power to conduct trials solely in the Senate.”
They argued that examining witnesses and issuing subpoenas are powers reserved for the Senate during an impeachment trial.
“It’s only the Senate that can conduct trial, that can examine witnesses, that can cross-examine witnesses, that can issue subpoena for the production of evidence,” the lawyer said.
Despite the objections, Duterte’s camp said the vice president is prepared to answer the allegations once the case reaches the Senate.
“Ready namin sagutin ang mga alegasyon laban sa VP sa tamang forum,” Poa said.
The House Committee on Justice earlier conducted a hearing to determine whether the impeachment complaints against Duterte should be endorsed to the plenary.