Group opposes suspending traffic apprehensions

The Lawyers for Commuters Safety and Protection on Friday opposed a proposal to suspend apprehensions of motorists violating traffic rules amid rising fuel prices linked to the conflict involving Iran, the United States and Israel.

LCSP founder Atty. Ariel Inton said traffic safety should never be compromised. “Road rules and regulations exist for a reason — to protect motorists and pedestrians and to ensure that traffic flows smoothly,” Inton said.

He warned that suspending apprehensions could create chaos on the roads. “Our streets will look like the Wild West. People will think they can get away with anything,” he said.

During a House transportation committee briefing on Wednesday, Swerte partylist Rep. Arlyn Ayon suggested temporarily suspending traffic apprehensions while fuel prices remain high.

Land Transportation Office (LTO) chief Assistant Secretary Markus Lacanilao said the proposal was not feasible.

“This is about road safety. The motorists we apprehend are those with violations. If motorists comply with the law, they will have no problem with the LTO,” Lacanilao said.

Inton clarified that the group supports reviewing excessive penalties imposed under the Joint Administrative Order governing traffic violations.

“The JAO serves as the basis for the high penalties imposed on motorists and public transport operators. Perhaps lawmakers led by Rep. Ayon can review the JAO, which has long burdened the transport sector,” Inton said.

He added that excessive penalties that are no longer reasonable should be suspended or revised.