Thursday, 20 August 2026
Nasdaq +0.18%
Subscribe NowSupport Us

Daily Tribune

Daily Tribune
Subscribe
Thursday, 20 August 2026
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Business
  • Life
  • Show
  • Sports
  • Global Goals
Partner feature

The Philippines' leading digital newspaper.

News
  • Headlines
  • Page three
  • Metro
  • Nation
  • World
  • Dyaryo Tirada
  • Obituary (Remember Me)
  • SONATOTOO (archive)
Opinion
  • All columnists
  • Editorials
  • Guest essays
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Scuttlebutt
Business
  • Shipping
  • Portraits
  • Pep
  • Business Advisories
  • Technology (Tech Talks)
Life
  • Show
  • Food & Drink
  • Getaways
  • Arts & Culture
  • Social Set
  • Spaces
  • Fashion & Beauty
  • The Edit
  • Top Form
  • Next Gen
  • Sacred Space
  • Project Larawan
  • Snaps
Sports
  • Hoops
  • Volley
  • Golf
  • Goal
  • Boxing
  • Tennis
  • Esports
  • Blast

Company

  • SONATOTOO archive
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Privacy
  • Subscribe
  • Support Us

© 2026 Daily Tribune · tribune.net.ph · Powered by Quintype

EDITORIAL

Breakup ends in prison

SC was clear about it. Man was not convicted because he only broke a promise to marry.

DT·19 August 2026, 9:59 pm·1 MIN READ

Breakup ends in prison
Text size
Partner feature

Stay informed

Get Daily Tribune in your inbox

Breaking news, opinion, and business coverage for readers in the Philippines and abroad.

Subscribe to the newsletter

Read next

Vice President Sara Duterte

16-vote hurdle stays in VP trial

What's your take?

Share

Google Preferred Sources

Get more Daily Tribune stories in your search results

Add Daily Tribune as a preferred source on Google Search.

Add to Google

Continue reading

  • U.S. sanctions ICC chief, senior lawyer
    U.S. sanctions ICC chief, senior lawyer
  • 16 votes for Sara conviction ‘set in stone’
    16 votes for Sara conviction ‘set in stone’
  • US sanctions ICC president, senior lawyer
    US sanctions ICC president, senior lawyer
Partner feature
Partner feature
Partner feature

Suggested Articles

ICC says US sanctions 'undermine the rule of law'
WORLD

ICC says US sanctions 'undermine the rule of law'

US sanctions on top members of the International Criminal Court "undermine the rule of law", the court said…

Agence France-Presse·23 hours ago

Cop jailed for psychological violence vs GF
PAGE THREE

Cop jailed for psychological violence vs GF

The Supreme Court (SC) sentenced a police officer to two years, four months and one day in jail for committing…

Alvin Murcia·18 August 2026

A fugitive’svanishing refuge
OPINION

A fugitive’svanishing refuge

From that moment he loses standing: he cannot participate, cannot seek relief, and regains his footing only by…

Jose Dominic F. Clavano IV·18 August 2026

SC convicts cop for psychological violence over withdrawn marriage license
NATION

SC convicts cop for psychological violence over withdrawn marriage license

The Supreme Court has upheld the conviction of a police officer for psychological violence against his then-pregnant…

Alvin Murcia·18 August 2026

Mastery over mandate
OPINION

Mastery over mandate

Importantly, the law does not prohibit spiral progression. It simply removes it as the only approach prescribed by…

Dean Nilo Divina·16 August 2026

Share

  • Supreme Court ruling
  • RA 9262
  • Psychological violence

Guy backed out of marrying his pregnant GF. The Supreme Court (SC) upheld his conviction. Nine years, four months max.

A miserable marriage starts looking like the lighter sentence.

SC didn’t say breaking up is a crime.

Some relationships? Terrible. You see them at restaurants. Nobody talking. Both on the phone. P8,000 dinner. Very romantic.

Leave. You can leave. Cancel the wedding. Change your mind. You can say “I love you” in January, wake up in July, look at the love of your life, realize she is actually the love of somebody else’s life. Go find that guy.

Consent is still consent. Man can say no. Woman can say no. Late? Still no. Flowers paid? Too bad, entourage already has the gowns.

SC was clear about it. Man was not convicted because he only broke a promise to marry.

He’s a cop. She’s a teacher. In love. Baby on the way. Families meet. Agree they should marry.

They schedule a trip to the registrar for a marriage license. He didn’t show. OK. Then he comes back. Apologizes. Asks to reschedule. They eventually lodge the application together. Then he withdraws it without notice.

This man saw the exit and walked past it several times. Incredible.

There’s a very useful sentence for situations like this: “I don’t want to marry you.”

Catastrophic. Very painful. Also extremely efficient.

You voice it, she cries, her mother calls you, your mother calls you. Your uncle suddenly has very strong views about your upbringing. Everybody hates you. You’re done.

Instead, this thing goes all the way up to the Supreme Court. The lower courts found serious psychological harm.

SC said the conduct had gone beyond a “simple heartbreak.”

Social worker saw her shaking, distraught. Psychometrician found her restless, depressive, suicidal.

Very serious. But what exactly does that prove about him? Her? It proves she suffered. Absolutely. A lot. Does it prove he wanted to psychologically damage her? Different question.

Maybe the guy was manipulating her. Could be. Maybe he knew exactly what he was doing.

Or maybe he was just scared.

Pregnant girlfriend. Two families. Everybody headed toward marriage. You have people who mean well. God save us from people who mean well.

“Are you OK?” “What happened?” “Have you talked to him?” “Did he say anything?” “Maybe you should give him space.”

The man knows why he left. She gets to figure out what the hell happened while everybody watches her figure it out.

There were plans. The baby. The people who already knew. The people who didn’t know. The people who knew but were pretending not to know. The people who knew and were absolutely dying to know whether you knew that they knew.

That is a very bad place to be.

Some people are evil. Some people are just idiots. People forget this possibility.

Very important distinction. We’re talking about nine years.

Maybe he didn’t know what he wanted. A coward. Maybe that’s all this guy was. Very weak. Very annoying. Not exactly criminal. Possibly a terrible boyfriend. Possibly an even worse husband.

She would suffer exactly the same either way. If he’s malicious, she can’t sleep. If he’s a coward, she can’t sleep. If he’s manipulating her, she will stop eating. If he’s panicking, she will still stop eating.

Same depression, tears. Same woman shaking in front of the social worker.

One man wanted to hurt her. The other couldn’t find the guts to leave her.

Both can leave a woman crying. Only one should go to prison for it.

Also read

Cop jailed for psychological violence vs GF
PAGE THREE

Cop jailed for psychological violence vs GF

The Supreme Court (SC) sentenced a police officer to two years, four months and one day in jail for committing psychological violence…

Alvin Murcia·18 August 2026

Also read

SC convicts cop for psychological violence over withdrawn marriage license
NATION

SC convicts cop for psychological violence over withdrawn marriage license

The Supreme Court has upheld the conviction of a police officer for psychological violence against his then-pregnant girlfriend after he…

Alvin Murcia·18 August 2026