Sara: Case not backed by evidence

Members of the House Prosecution Panel during the fifth day of the impeachment trial against Vice President Sara Duterte on Tuesday, 14 July.
Aram Lascano

Members of the House Prosecution Panel during the fifth day of the impeachment trial against Vice President Sara Duterte on Tuesday, 14 July.
Aram Lascano

The Senate should allow ordinary Filipinos to attend the impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte through a…

A former Commission on Audit (CoA) official testified before the Senate impeachment court on Monday that the Office of…

The Office of the Vice President (OVP) on Monday disputed the prosecution’s claim that it spent its P125-million…

Put more plainly, only around one in 10 Filipinos was paying close attention. Nearly one in three was barely aware that…

The Palace calls this a compliance with a legal obligation. It is worth noting that the obligation became easier to…
Vice President Sara Duterte on Tuesday said the fourth day of her Senate impeachment trial reinforced her claim that the case against her was unsupported by evidence, after the proceedings focused on allegations that she threatened the lives of President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. and two others.
In a statement, Duterte rejected the prosecution’s presentation, accusing it of building its case on fabricated claims rather than on proof.
“The country witnessed what I have been saying all along: the complaint is not supported by evidence,” she said.
“Repeatedly claiming that there were threats when none existed, inventing an assassin where there was none, and fabricating evidence to support those claims does not transform fiction into fact,” Duterte said.
She argued that such actions undermine public institutions, erode public trust, waste public resources, and “corrupt the search for the truth.”
National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) regional director Jeremy Lotoc testified on Monday as a prosecution witness on the article of impeachment accusing Duterte of making grave threats.
Lotoc said NBI investigators concluded that Duterte’s November 2024 remarks against Marcos, First Lady Liza Araneta-Marcos and former House Speaker Martin Romualdez were “serious” and warranted criminal charges.
On cross-examination, however, the defense pressed Lotoc on the absence of validated information identifying any hired assassin, arguing that investigators had no evidence that anyone had actually been hired to carry out the plot.
The prosecution countered that the offense of grave threats did not depend on proving the existence of a hired killer.