No Dela Rosa manhunt
‘These were not acts of inaction, but adherence to the constitutional order, due process, and the rule of law.’

‘These were not acts of inaction, but adherence to the constitutional order, due process, and the rule of law.’


Filipino households paid the highest electricity prices in Southeast Asia in June, with consumers served by the…

Senator Robin Padilla on Monday took issue with Ombudsman Jesus Crispin “Boying” Remulla’s statement last week that he…

The ruling stated that due process protections apply even before an impeachment case reaches the Senate and that…

Alternergy Holdings Corp. has raised P2.3 billion from the partial sale of two wind power projects nearing completion…

Courts have long recognized that language must be examined in its entirety — its context, purpose, surrounding…
The Department of the Interior and Local Government (DILG) on Monday clarified its actions after Senator Ronald “Bato” dela Rosa resurfaced at the Senate last week, stressing that the law enforcement agencies were following legal and constitutional directives — not refusing to act.
In a statement, the DILG said its response was guided by President Ferdinand Marcos Jr.’s directive to await the Supreme Court’s ruling on the enforceability of the International Criminal Court (ICC) arrest warrant on Dela Rosa, in the absence of a corresponding order from a Philippine court.
“The department emphasizes that in Senator Dela Rosa’s case, while an ICC warrant had been issued, the President directed the agencies concerned, including the DILG and the Philippine National Police, to await the Supreme Court’s resolution,” it said.
The DILG also cited Section 17 of Republic Act 9851, noting that in cases involving alleged crimes against humanity, the government may either surrender the individual to the ICC or pursue prosecution in local courts.
It added that, as clarified by Ombudsman Jesus Crispin Remulla, there was “no order for a manhunt,” and any enforcement action remained “conditional,” given the pending Supreme Court proceedings and the Senate’s decision to place Dela Rosa under its protective custody.
The DILG maintained that its actions were not a sign of inaction but a compliance with the law.
“These were not acts of inaction, but adherence to the constitutional order, due process, and the rule of law,” the agency said, adding that it remained committed to enforcing the law within the bounds of democratic institutions.