Ombudsman casts net for online leak source



Public prosecutor Rep. Terry Ridon said Vice President Sara Duterte could not invoke her right against…

The House prosecution panel will remain focused on presenting its evidence and leave it to the Senate impeachment court…
The Department of Human Settlements and Urban Development (DHSUD) will award at least 913 land titles to families from…

Two workers at a solar farm in Barangay Cayanga, Bugallon, Pangasinan, were arrested after they were allegedly caught…

Two overseas Filipino workers recovering from strokes in the United Arab Emirates are set to receive post-acute care…
The Office of the Ombudsman said it would investigate and identify individuals responsible for publicly leaking the identities of its investigators, citing possible security risks to government personnel.
“We are currently coordinating with the National Bureau of Investigation and the PNP Anti-Cybercrime Group to identify the perpetrators and will pursue maximum legal penalties under the Data Privacy Act and the Cybercrime Prevention Act against all individuals involved in the leak and dissemination of these confidential documents,” the Ombudsman said in a statement.
The office also defended its handling of cases involving high-ranking officials.
According to the Ombudsman, recent actions taken in its ongoing investigation form part of a “multi-stage legal strategy” intended to prevent complications during the course of the probe.
“These initial measures are designed to secure the State’s interests and prevent the flight of individuals or assets while the universe of cases continue to mature,” it said.
On Saturday, the Ombudsman asked the Sandiganbayan to issue precautionary hold departure orders (PHDO) against former Senate President Francis Escudero and businessman Maynard Ngu over their alleged links to the anomalous flood control controversy.
Earlier in the week, former House Speaker Martin Romualdez was also issued a PHDO after he was scheduled to travel to Singapore for a medical checkup following an angioplasty procedure.
Romualdez later questioned the filing of the order and urged the Ombudsman to inhibit itself from the flood control probe, alleging prejudgment of his case.
Amid the controversy, the Ombudsman stressed that it would not act as legal counsel in testing the credibility of witnesses or evidence during public discussions.
The office said such matters should instead be addressed during preliminary investigation proceedings, where probable cause and sufficiency of evidence are formally determined before trial.