Designer Katie Perry wins trademark spat against singer Katy Perry
Australia’s High Court has now ruled in favor of the local designer on appeal.

Australia’s High Court has now ruled in favor of the local designer on appeal.


The lesson is clear: Genuine distinctiveness must come from more than superficial styling or an ordinary qualifying…

Some 13,441 applicants have been cleared by the Supreme Court’s (SC) Office of the Bar Confidant (OBC) to take the 2026…

Operatives also recovered the buy-bust money consisting of a genuine P500 bill, 139 pieces of P500 boodle money and an…

The impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte may be moved to the afternoon starting September as senators seek…

One person died and three were wounded after a sword-wielding attacker entered a high school in the town of Fagersta in…
SYDNEY, Australia (AFP) — Australian designer Katie Perry has won the right to sell clothes under her name, claiming victory Wednesday in a years-long trademark spat with American pop megastar Katy Perry.
Designer Katie Perry accused her far more famous namesake of trademark infringement, arguing she had claimed the “Katie Perry” brand before the singer became a global sensation.
But songstress Katy Perry said her music had already gone “viral” as the designer started selling clothes around 2008, and sought to have the Australian trademark scrubbed out.
An Australian court agreed with the singer, ruling in 2024 the clothing trademark should be canceled.
But Australia’s High Court has now ruled in favor of the local designer on appeal, finding there was unlikely to be any risk of “confusion” between the two.
A representative for the singer told Agence France-Presse that despite the legal action she “has never sought to close down” the Australian business.