Daily TribuneTechnology can optimize traffic, but it cannot untangle a city built on bad habits, political inertia, and a public transport system people don’t trust.
Manila’s traffic isn’t just an inconvenience; it’s a national crisis measured in lost time, lost money, and lives spent inching forward.
Photograph courtesy of Bridget Adolfo
There’s a certain poetry to Metro Manila’s traffic — a stubborn, infuriating, utterly relentless force of nature that dictates the rhythm of daily life. The capital’s streets, perpetually suffocated by an ever-expanding fleet of vehicles, have long defied order, patience and even the best-laid plans of policymakers. But recently, in a conference room at the Metropolitan Manila Development Authority office in Pasig, the Japan International Cooperation Agency signed yet another agreement, another promise of salvation — this time in the form of a three-year technical cooperation project aimed at enhancing traffic management through intelligent transportation systems.
This initiative follows the Comprehensive Traffic Management Plan, a grand-sounding strategy born from a previous JICA-MMDA partnership (2019–2022), which attempted to untangle the metropolis from its vehicular mess.
The MMDA, in coordination with 17 local government units, is already working on a five-year action plan based on this blueprint.
And now, another layer is being added to the ongoing effort: improving traffic regulation, creating a centralized data system, and injecting modernized, Japan-engineered intelligence into the city’s transportation infrastructure.
The urgency of these measures cannot be overstated. In 2024, Metro Manila’s traffic earned the dubious distinction of being the worst in the world, according to the TomTom Traffic Index — beating out 386 other cities across 55 countries.
That’s not just an inconvenience; it’s a national crisis. A 2017 JICA survey estimated that the economic cost of congestion in Metro Manila was P3.5 billion per day.
By 2035, if nothing significant changes, that number could balloon to P5.4 billion.
That’s billions of pesos lost — not just in wasted fuel and productivity, but in missed opportunities, in businesses that might have thrived if only people could get to work on time, in lives spent in the merciless crawl of EDSA instead of with family, in homes.
The causes are depressingly familiar. Car ownership has surged, with nearly half a million new vehicles hitting the roads in 2024 alone.
The alternative? A public transport system so unreliable and fragmented that, for many, a car — despite its cost — is the only rational choice. The result: a capital that cannot breathe. And it’s not just a local problem.
Manila’s traffic congestion is an economic deterrent, one of the many reasons why the Philippines struggles to attract foreign investment while its Asean neighbors pull ahead.
JICA’s solution? A smarter, more coordinated approach. This new initiative will equip the MMDA with better traffic management tools, introduce data-driven decision-making, and integrate modernized intelligent transportation systems.
JICA’s chief representative, Sakamoto Takema, spoke of Japan’s commitment to bringing “Japan Quality” ITS measures to Manila.
But technology alone cannot solve a problem that is as much political and cultural as it is infrastructural.
JICA has long been a patron of Philippine transportation reforms — funding railways, subways, bridge rehabilitations and public transport improvements.
This latest agreement is another piece in that puzzle, another attempt to nudge Metro Manila toward a livable future.
But whether the city’s roads will ever be free from their daily gridlock is a question that no memorandum of cooperation, no matter how well-intentioned, can fully answer.
