Dear Editor,

Amid the issue of plots against President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., his recent dismissal of a “loyalty check” for the military and police is raising crucial questions about leadership, trust and professionalism in vital institutions.

There is no doubt the Philippines has a long and complex history of military intervention in politics — from the Marcos Sr. reign to more recent episodes of unrest, the specter of a politicized military looms large in the national psyche.

Against this backdrop, Marcos Jr.’s forgoing of loyalty checks may be interpreted in two ways.

For one, this may be seen as a positive step toward civilian supremacy and the depoliticization of the armed forces. By asserting that such checks are “not a practice within the country’s armed forces or police force,” Marcos attempts to project an image of a leader committed to a professional and independent military.

However, this interpretation ignores the possibility that the denial is a strategic move to quell anxieties within the military and maintain control. The public announcement, while reassuring, could simply be a way of masking a more nuanced approach.

Perhaps loyalty checks are indeed occurring, but in a less overt, more subtle manner.

Also, focusing solely on the absence of checks overlooks the bigger question: Why were concerns about loyalty checks raised in the first place? The very suggestion highlights tension between the civilian leadership and the military.

This tension could stem from several factors. The recent political realignment, with Vice President Sara Duterte and Marcos seemingly on different sides of the political spectrum, might be a source of unease within the ranks.

Additionally, lingering questions about Marcos Sr.’s relationship with the military during the dictatorship could be contributing to an atmosphere of suspicion.

Regardless of the reason, the President needs to do more than simply forgo such checks.

He must take concrete steps to rebuild trust and solidify civilian control over the military, which includes fostering open communication channels with military leaders, ensuring transparency in appointments and promotions, and upholding the principles of meritocracy within the armed forces.

The Philippine National Police has echoed President Marcos’ sentiment, reiterating its commitment to the Constitution and the “duly constituted authorities.”

While this is a positive move, the PNP should work alongside the Armed Forces of the Philippines to implement robust internal mechanisms that prevent any potential for politicization.

Strengthening professional education within the military and police is critical. Educational programs that focus on democratic values, human rights, and the importance of civilian control can go a long way in building a professional and apolitical force.

Finally, fostering closer collaboration between the military and police can be beneficial. By working together on national security issues, both institutions can build trust and mutual respect, further cementing their commitment to the nation’s well-being.

The specter of a politicized military is a threat to any democracy, and Marcos and the leadership of the AFP and PNP have a unique opportunity to address these anxieties head-on.

By prioritizing transparency, accountability, and professional development, they can lay the groundwork for a future where both the military and police are seen as guardians of the Constitution, loyal to the state and not to any individual or political party.

However, navigating this path requires more than just public pronouncements. Concrete actions that address the root causes of concern will be the true test of Marcos’s commitment to a genuinely apolitical military and police force.

The Filipino people deserve to feel confident that the nation’s security is in the hands of professionals dedicated to upholding the rule of law and serving the best interests of the country.

Sincerely,

Jolo Buenaobra

jolbuen_1969@yahoo.com