UN Special Rapporteur for Freedom of Opinion and Expression Irene Khan overstepped her boundaries by meddling in a country’s internal affairs and advocating for the abolition of a legitimate anti-insurgency body, thus raising concerns about her objectivity and understanding of complex security challenges.

As a figure of moral authority, the role of a United Nations special rapporteur is to advocate for human rights, promote justice, and hold governments accountable for their actions.

While gallivanting around the Philippines for 10 days, Khan couldn’t resist sticking her nose into the country’s affairs, claiming that the over-five-year-old National Task Force to End Local Communist Armed Conflict is as outdated as last season’s fashion and should be tossed out like yesterday’s leftovers.

Our government rolled out the red carpet for her, giving her the VIP treatment. But after rubbing elbows with our officials, Khan dropped the bombshell that her actual game plan was to tear down the NTF-ELCAC. Talk about a slap in the face after all the hospitality!

An adamant Khan claimed the NTF-ELCAC is out of touch and neglects to factor in the present opportunities for peace negotiations pursued by President Ferdinand Marcos Jr.’s administration with the National Democratic Front of the Philippines.

Many, including Undersecretary Ernesto Torres Jr., NTF-ELCAC executive director, took offense at her pronouncements against the Philippine government.

He spilled the beans that the NTF-ELCAC felt “stabbed in the back” and thought the UN expert was “missing the big picture” regarding the government’s well-oiled anti-terrorism and peace efforts.

We’re all for human rights and justice, but it seems someone has gone “nosy neighbor” mode, sticking her nose where it doesn’t belong, like peeking through the curtains to be in everyone’s business.

Khan’s recommendation is like telling a friend how to run their own household. She may have meant well but doesn’t have the complete picture of what’s happening behind their front door. Each country deals with its unique hurdles, especially when it comes to security, and it’s not always a one-size-fits-all situation.

Suggesting to scrap NTF-ELCAC without fully understanding the complex security issues at play is comparable to telling a chef to throw out their whole spice rack just because she didn’t like one seasoning. It’s essential to recognize that countries often face genuine and immediate threats to their stability, and decisions about security measures should be made with a deep understanding of the local context.

There’s a fine line between offering constructive criticism and barging in like an uninvited guest at a party. It’s essential to respect a nation’s sovereignty and work alongside them to address human rights concerns rather than waltzing in and demanding changes without a complete understanding of the situation on the ground.

While the role of special rapporteurs is invaluable, they should make sure they know what’s what before they start stirring the pot in other countries. She may not have barged in, but she tried to dismantle a crucial part of the government’s defense strategy. Isn’t it like throwing a spanner in the works?

At the end of the day, handling security issues is mainly the country’s job, and any outside help should be all about boosting the government’s ability to protect human rights while dealing with security challenges like a pro.

Remember that collaboration and understanding go beyond sticking our noses where they don’t belong. After all, a little respect can do wonders for finding common ground.

Collaboration and dialogue, rather than unilateral demands based on communist allies’ instigations, are essential to fostering meaningful change and promoting a more secure and just world for all.