This photo illustration created on 7 January 2025, in Washington, DC, shows an image of Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Meta, and an image of the Meta logo. Social media giant Meta on 7 January 2025, slashed its content moderation policies, including ending its US fact-checking program, in a major shift that conforms with the priorities of incoming president Donald Trump. Drew ANGERER / AFP
WORLD

Meta’s policy shift: fact-checking ends, DEI programs dismantled

Social media giant moves in a new direction, drawing criticism and raising questions about priorities.

Agence France-Presse, TDT

Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, has announced sweeping policy changes, including the termination of its U.S. fact-checking program and the dismantling of its diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. These decisions mark a significant shift in the tech giant’s strategy as it aligns with politically conservative priorities.

Fact-Checking Program Ends

The White House declined to comment on Meta’s abrupt decision to end its third-party fact-checking program earlier this week. White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre emphasized that social media companies are responsible for enforcing their own rules to prevent the spread of misinformation but noted that they "make their own rules" about content moderation.

Meta’s founder and CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, justified the move by criticizing the fact-checking program as "too politically biased" and leading to "too much censorship." Instead, Meta plans to adopt "Community Notes," a crowd-sourced moderation tool similar to the one used by X, formerly Twitter. However, researchers have raised concerns about the effectiveness of such tools in combating false information.

Meta’s decision comes amidst ongoing criticism from conservative groups, including supporters of President-elect Donald Trump, who have accused the platform of suppressing conservative voices under the guise of combating misinformation—claims that professional fact-checkers strongly deny.

DEI Programs Disbanded

In another major shift, Meta announced on Friday that it is dismantling its DEI programs, which were established to promote diversity within the company. According to an internal memo first reported by Axios, Meta will eliminate its diverse slate hiring approach and disband its DEI team.

The changes are reportedly driven by a “changing legal and policy landscape” following recent Supreme Court decisions that overturned diversity-focused programs in U.S. universities. The DEI restructuring also aligns with broader corporate trends, as several major brands have scaled back similar programs in the wake of President-elect Trump’s election victory in November.

Meta’s Chief Diversity Officer Maxine Williams will transition to a new role focused on accessibility and engagement as the company phases out dedicated DEI initiatives. Additionally, Meta will terminate its supplier diversity program, which prioritized sourcing from businesses owned by women and minorities. Instead, the company will focus on supporting small and medium-sized businesses more broadly.

Political and Corporate Pressures

These policy shifts come as Meta faces pressure from Trump and conservative groups. Trump has been a vocal critic of Meta and Zuckerberg, accusing the company of bias against him and threatening retaliation once back in office. Since Trump’s election in November, Zuckerberg has sought to reconcile with the president-elect, including donating $1 million to his inauguration fund and hiring a Republican public affairs chief.

Meta’s moves reflect broader corporate trends, as companies like Walmart, Ford, and Harley-Davidson have also scaled back diversity initiatives. Critics argue that these shifts undermine efforts to address longstanding racial and social disparities, while supporters claim they are a response to changing legal and political landscapes.

What’s Next for Meta?

With its fact-checking and DEI programs dismantled, Meta faces a critical juncture. These decisions could reshape its public perception and impact the trust of its user base. While Zuckerberg defends the changes as necessary and aligned with user concerns, critics warn of potential setbacks in combating misinformation and promoting inclusivity.

As the company navigates this new path, questions remain about the implications for social media’s role in society and the balance between corporate independence and social responsibility.ddd