SC issues maiden ruling in Filipino
The High Court stressed that language plays a crucial role in promoting access to justice and narrowing the gap between judicial decisions and public understanding.

The High Court stressed that language plays a crucial role in promoting access to justice and narrowing the gap between judicial decisions and public understanding.


Department of Migrant Workers (DMW) Secretary Hans Leo Cacdac visited Filipino seafarers affected by the attack in the…

The Supreme Court (SC) has rejected a petition seeking to compel the Senate Blue Ribbon Committee to release the full,…

The Supreme Court En Banc on Wednesday dismissed a petition seeking to compel the Senate Blue Ribbon Committee to…

The Civil Aviation Authority of the Philippines (CAAP) has strengthened regional air connectivity with the resumption…

A party-list lawmaker and several labor groups have asked the Supreme Court (SC) to nullify Pasig Regional Trial Court…
The Supreme Court (SC) has issued a landmark decision written in Filipino to make justice more accessible and understandable to ordinary Filipinos.
In a 14-page ruling penned by Maria Filomena Singh, the High Court stressed that language plays a crucial role in promoting access to justice and narrowing the gap between judicial decisions and public understanding.
The decision, issued in G.R. 210480, underscored that using Filipino in court rulings allows litigants and citizens to better comprehend legal decisions without the burden of highly technical language or the need for translation.
The case stemmed from a petition filed by Mel Velarde and Angeline Macasaet questioning the proceedings before the Court of Tax Appeals (CTA) in a tax evasion complaint related to the alleged undervaluation of a property transaction.
Petition moot
However, the SC dismissed the petition for being moot and academic after the CTA earlier junked the criminal case, and the dismissal became final and executory.
The tribunal said there was no longer an actual controversy that required resolution, adding that none of the recognized exceptions to the mootness doctrine applied in the case.
Despite the shift to Filipino, the SC emphasized that legal precision remains intact, noting that legal doctrines and technical concepts can still be conveyed clearly and accurately while remaining understandable to the public.