
Lawyers for Vice President Sara Duterte said Monday they are considering asking the Supreme Court (SC) to review the…

‘So we need to examine the extent of her wealth and compare it against her legitimate income.’

Senator-judge Robin Padilla on Monday questioned what he called the unequal treatment in the handling of the…

“A good meal nourishes more than the body — it brings families together and gives hope for a better tomorrow.” This was…

Filipino households paid the highest electricity prices in Southeast Asia in June, with consumers served by the…

What's your take?
Google Preferred Sources
Get more Daily Tribune stories in your search results
Add Daily Tribune as a preferred source on Google Search.
Continue reading
Supporters of Vice President Sara Duterte were allegedly among those amplifying online rumors that President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. was paralyzed, terminally ill, or dead, fueling a wave of disinformation that the government described as a threat to national stability.
On Facebook, TikTok and X, edited videos, recycled photographs, and false medical claims spread rapidly following Marcos’ brief hospitalization in January for diverticulitis.
Fact checkers of Agence France-Presse tracked hundreds of posts claiming Marcos was incapacitated or had secretly died as the Marcos-Duterte alliance unraveled.
Last month, Marcos performed jumping jacks and jogged to his office before reporters and cameras in an attempt to dispel the rumors.
The controversy revived memories of the secrecy surrounding the health of his father, former President Ferdinand Marcos Sr., who suffered from kidney disease in the final years of his rule.
Earlier, former broadcaster Jay Sonza posted an old photograph of a Philippine flag flying at half-staff, further fueling speculation online.
Weeks later, agents of the National Bureau of Investigation arrested Sonza on charges of cyberlibel and unlawful publication over allegedly fabricated medical records of the President.
Officials also warned Meta, Facebook’s parent company, that “panic-inducing” online content posed “a direct and escalating threat to public order, economic confidence, and national security.”