Romualdez refutes travel claims, seeks explanation on HDO
Text size
Buddies, associates? One happy family?
A traditional dish called zongzi is served during China’s Dragon Boat Festival, which falls in June. It is a rice…
Divina credited the firm’s achievements to its members, thanking them for their ‘hard work, dedication, teamwork, and…
‘Sec. Vince Dizon, please explain how this finding of your own team should not be flagged as a ghost project in Taguig.’
The camp of former House Speaker Martin Romualdez denounced claims that he had already fled the country in light of the hold departure order issued by the Sandiganbayan.
Ade Fajardo, the lawyer of the former house speaker, clarified rumors that his client was already out of the country following his request to embark on a five-day medical trip to Singapore.
“We categorically clarify: Rep. Romualdez is in the Philippines and has not left the country. Any report or insinuation that he has fled is false and irresponsible,” he said in a statement.
This was echoed through a post on Romualdez’s social media platform where he urged netizens to be wary and validate any information they see before sharing and accepting the rumor as fact.
The court order, which was requested by the Office of the Ombudsman, was granted in the Seventh Division of the anti-graft court last Wednesday, 22 April.
Assistant Ombudsman Mico Clavano explained that the measure was sought to ensure that there would be no challenges in its ongoing probe into Romualdez’s alleged involvement in kickback schemes linked to the anomalous flood control scandal.
“While the cases are pending before the Office of the Ombudsman, the teams find it necessary to seek this remedy so as to not jeopardize the cases,” Clavano said in a message to reporters.
“They do not want the respondent to abscond and evade office processes,” he added.
Fajardo, on the other hand, maintained that his client underwent the proper process to secure a travel pass for his medical endeavor.
The lawyer claimed that the action which was meant with good intent had been twisted to fit the narrative that his client was attempting to evade responsibility.
He further expressed that their camp was going to pursue legal action to understand the legal basis behind the issuance of the hold departure order.
“We will avail of all appropriate legal remedies to question the issuance of this order before the proper forum,” he said.
Ombudsman Jesus Crispin Remulla said in an earlier interview that their unfavourable response to the request of Romualdez was meant as a safety measure, noting its coincidental nature following the arrest of former congressman Elizaldy “Zaldy” Co.
